Talk:Hospital accreditation

Tone and style of article

Point taken, Orlady.

Would someone else mind contributing to this article please, in terms of structure and content. The subject is, I think, an important one and deserving of an article.

The overall wording of the article seems even-handed and balanced to me, but then again that is only my opinion. Hence, other writers please !!!!!!! Many thanks

Professorial 22:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Professorial[reply]

I'll outline some of my thoughts on this article, in hopes that someone knowledgable on the subject will be working to improve the article. I notice that the first paragraph does not provide the type of introduction called for in WP guidelines:

Start your article with a concise lead section or introduction defining the topic at hand and mentioning the most important points. The reader should be able to get a good overview by only reading the lead, which should be between one and four paragraphs long, depending on the length of the article. See Wikipedia:Lead section.

More importantly, that first paragraph consists mostly of "motherhood and apple pie" statements about the importance of healthcare. I don't think that very many people would take issue with those statements, but they are unsourced and the tone of the following is not appropriate for Wikipedia:

Hospitals and healthcare services are vital components of any well-ordered and humane society, and will indisputably be the recipients of societal resources. That hospitals should be places of safety, not only for patients but also for the staff and for the general public, is of the greatest importance. Quality of hospitals and healthcare services is also of great interest to many other bodies, including governments, NGOs targeting healthcare and social welfare, professional organisations representing doctors, patient organisations, shareholders of companies providing healthcare services, etc. How quality is maintained and improved in hospitals and healthcare services is the subject of much debate.

Can that be replaced with sourced information about the objectives of hospital accreditation? (To come after, not before, a lead paragraph that tells what accreditation is.) --Orlady 23:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been re-structured to bring it more into line with Wkipedia standards, but work by others would be much appreciated. Many thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Professorial (talk • contribs) 16:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hospital accreditation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091003162940/http://www.bmj.com:80/cgi/eletters/323/7310/443 to http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/323/7310/443

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hospital accreditation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Organizations

The content on hospital accreditation organizations is mostly redundant with content on List of international healthcare accreditation organizations. The listings could probably be deleted from this article WP:HOS -- Talk to G Moore 14:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]