User contributions for Ruler in Peace
Appearance
A user with 93 edits. Account created on 11 September 2022.
11 November 2024
- 18:3018:30, 11 November 2024 diff hist −16 m Santiago Ramón y Cajal Wordiness fixed Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
29 October 2024
- 19:5519:55, 29 October 2024 diff hist −215 m Tomás Luis de Victoria Removed controversial unsourced statement Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:3212:32, 29 October 2024 diff hist −2 m Finland Exceedingly (a literary term that makes no sense in this context) to extremely Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2612:26, 29 October 2024 diff hist 0 m Finland "Became part of sweden" is a misrepresentation of reality. Cant have that coexisting with "was captured from sweden by russia". Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 October 2024
- 23:3423:34, 25 October 2024 diff hist +2,543 Blond Undid revision 1253397699 by EvergreenFir (talk) I dont think the onus is on me to ach8eve perfect absolute consensus, especially on such controversial topics. Otherwise basically no article in Wikipedia would exists, because total consensus is basically impossible in any non-trivial subject. I have been asking for reasons why my edit is reverted and been given none. Please see the talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2923:29, 25 October 2024 diff hist +1,049 Talk:Blond →Please stop reverting edits without providing reasons: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 23:1923:19, 25 October 2024 diff hist +378 Talk:Blond →Please stop reverting edits without providing reasons: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 19:4019:40, 25 October 2024 diff hist +830 Talk:Blond →Please stop reverting edits without providing reasons: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 19:3519:35, 25 October 2024 diff hist +2,543 Blond Undid revision 1253386187 by TylerBurden (talk) Dear TylerBurden, I am not edit warring anymore than you are. Please provide an explanation to why you are reverting my edit Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:3319:33, 25 October 2024 diff hist +163 User talk:Ruler in Peace →October 2024: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 19:3219:32, 25 October 2024 diff hist +1,146 Talk:Blond →Last sentence of the intro is unprofessional: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:0715:07, 25 October 2024 diff hist +729 Talk:Blond →Last sentence of the intro is unprofessional: Reply Tag: Reply
24 October 2024
- 20:0220:02, 24 October 2024 diff hist +17 m Brown hair This image is better because instead of simply showing hair it provides more emotional connection by showing a famous person. Emulating the Blond page showing a famous footballer. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:5817:58, 24 October 2024 diff hist +550 User talk:Ruler in Peace →October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:5317:53, 24 October 2024 diff hist +857 Blond added sources and tried to use less "editorializing" language Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:4517:45, 24 October 2024 diff hist +31 m Women in Nazi Germany →Physical standards: beauty is completely subjective. what one culture finds beautiful another may not, and no culture's standard of beauty is more valid or real than any other's. So saying nazis' standard for women was for them to be "beautiful" is nonsensical, since there is no universal concept of beautiful at all. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:3917:39, 24 October 2024 diff hist +1,681 Blond Undid revision 1253131363 by Clovermoss (talk) In the talk page it has been agreed that "Which is obviously seen as misogynistic and untrue, and yet the stereotype is still used for jokes" is fine. So what is so different between that statement and mine that makes you call mine editorializing, yet be fine with the other one? I don't assume bad faith. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 17:3617:36, 24 October 2024 diff hist +270 Talk:Blond →Last sentence of the intro is unprofessional: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:0207:02, 24 October 2024 diff hist −473 Talk:Blond →Racism in this article is rampant.
- 07:0207:02, 24 October 2024 diff hist +423 Talk:Blond →Last sentence of the intro is unprofessional: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:0107:01, 24 October 2024 diff hist +473 Talk:Blond →Racism in this article is rampant.: new section Tag: New topic
- 06:5906:59, 24 October 2024 diff hist +1,681 Blond Undid revision 1253011576 by TylerBurden (talk) What NPOV is my rv violating exactly? Threatening your racist views isn't violating a neutral point of view, it's violating yours. Tags: Undo Reverted
23 October 2024
- 13:3713:37, 23 October 2024 diff hist +1,231 Blond There were A LOT of problems with this article, which had many racist statements. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
11 October 2024
- 14:0514:05, 11 October 2024 diff hist −17 m Brittany →Gallo-Roman era: the term underclass is classist Tag: Visual edit
- 08:3708:37, 11 October 2024 diff hist +397 Black Cube the previous edit was absurd, suggesting blackcube acts against their clients (although funnily enough their incompetence sometimes does make this the case). Added to the third paragraph of the introduction, dedicated to notable controversies Tag: Visual edit
9 February 2024
- 09:3009:30, 9 February 2024 diff hist +23 Haversian canal added osteonic canal name Tag: Visual edit
6 February 2024
- 12:5912:59, 6 February 2024 diff hist −1 m Lost in Random →Premise: grammar fix Tag: Visual edit
2 February 2024
- 09:3709:37, 2 February 2024 diff hist +421 Ligature (medicine) →History: solved inaccuracy Tag: Visual edit
1 February 2024
- 17:2817:28, 1 February 2024 diff hist +1,086 Peanut Added info in histoy Tag: Visual edit
12 December 2023
- 21:1721:17, 12 December 2023 diff hist +25 Luteinizing hormone →Etymology: added links Tag: Visual edit
- 21:0921:09, 12 December 2023 diff hist +478 Luteinizing hormone Added etymology section Tag: Visual edit
2 December 2023
- 21:1721:17, 2 December 2023 diff hist +229 Talk:Ahmad Sa'adat →Stop the misconstruction: new section Tag: New topic
- 21:1421:14, 2 December 2023 diff hist +10 Ahmad Sa'adat Again fixed an inaccuracy. It is claimed Saadat protested "Israel", which was not the case. In the source's words: "These prisoners are on hunger strike to protest Israel’s humiliating policies and continuous collective punishment, the most serious being: solitary confinement, denial of visitation, the imposition of fines and the prohibition of books and newspapers. They also decried the fact that Gazan prisoners were denied visits outright under administrative detention [...]"
1 December 2023
- 11:3811:38, 1 December 2023 diff hist −3 m Georgios Alogoskoufis →Criticism: Fixed spelling an grammar
4 November 2023
- 23:5623:56, 4 November 2023 diff hist +2 Mira Schor →Early life and education
- 23:5623:56, 4 November 2023 diff hist −14 Mira Schor →Early life and education
28 October 2023
- 17:2317:23, 28 October 2023 diff hist +2 Justin Roiland →Early life
- 17:2217:22, 28 October 2023 diff hist +76 Justin Roiland →Early life
- 17:2117:21, 28 October 2023 diff hist +171 Justin Roiland →Early life
23 July 2023
- 15:2615:26, 23 July 2023 diff hist +19 Sam Dolgoff →Biography Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
26 June 2023
- 14:2714:27, 26 June 2023 diff hist +428 Talk:Battle of Augusta →A History of the French Navy by Jenkins: new section Tag: New topic
- 14:2214:22, 26 June 2023 diff hist −14 Battle of Augusta Undid revision 1161422815 by DavidDijkgraaf (talk) Tag: Undo
22 June 2023
- 16:1116:11, 22 June 2023 diff hist −2 Battle of Augusta No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0916:09, 22 June 2023 diff hist −23 Battle of Augusta →Battle: Fixed inaccuracy in the portrayal of the source cited. Jenkins is clear that De la Cerda's action was decisive, not merely "belated assistance" Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0316:03, 22 June 2023 diff hist +44 Battle of Augusta No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0216:02, 22 June 2023 diff hist −48 Battle of Augusta The Dutch were not the most involved in the fighting, and in fact retreated early, leaving the Spanish alone to fight the French. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0016:00, 22 June 2023 diff hist −19 Battle of Augusta Fixed inaccuracy. The combined hispano-dutch fleet was commanded by Don Francisco de la Cerda, to whom de Ruyter relinquished command. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:5715:57, 22 June 2023 diff hist +34 Battle of Augusta Fixed inaccuracy Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 June 2023
- 12:5912:59, 20 June 2023 diff hist +18 Christo and Jeanne-Claude No edit summary
12 June 2023
- 13:5713:57, 12 June 2023 diff hist +14 Jack Dragna No edit summary