User contributions for Armon

9 January 2009

• 23:4323:43, 9 January 2009 diff hist +9 David Irving Undid revision 263073433 by 79.69.120.222 (talk)

8 January 2009

• 12:2812:28, 8 January 2009 diff hist −1,338 Middle East Media Research Institute rm blogs -find proper sources. A self-published source is only OK for articles about the writer themselves
• 12:0912:09, 8 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Robert Fisk →Osama bin Laden, 9/11, and the war in Afghanistan: ,
• 12:0712:07, 8 January 2009 diff hist +21 Robert Fisk →Osama bin Laden, 9/11, and the war in Afghanistan: make clear who Fisk thought ordered attacks
• 12:0412:04, 8 January 2009 diff hist +924 Robert Fisk rv -please don't delete cited material.
• 11:5911:59, 8 January 2009 diff hist +81 Hamas rv to earlier version which better explained how the fighing started, and the difference between H and Fatah
• 10:2510:25, 8 January 2009 diff hist +2,068 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: in determining proper weight we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors.
• 09:5009:50, 8 January 2009 diff hist +18 Il manifesto {{unreferenced}} tag
• 09:3609:36, 8 January 2009 diff hist +471 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: That's neither the letter or the spirit of the relevant policy.
• 08:1808:18, 8 January 2009 diff hist −292 m Tariq Ali I see Democracy Now called him a "historian" -very poor source and incorrect
• 08:1208:12, 8 January 2009 diff hist +7 Tariq Ali He's not actually a historian and the cite doesn't call him one
• 08:0008:00, 8 January 2009 diff hist +7 m Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: toning it down...
• 07:4407:44, 8 January 2009 diff hist −7 m Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: typo
• 07:4307:43, 8 January 2009 diff hist −875 New antisemitism rv. instead of edit warring youeself Tarc, perhaps you could justify the inclusion of an extremist source on talk...
• 07:4107:41, 8 January 2009 diff hist +465 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: What's relevant is that you are simply resorting to special pleading.
• 06:5106:51, 8 January 2009 diff hist +150 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: BTW that's a European, not a Texan, political spectrum.
• 06:4906:49, 8 January 2009 diff hist +733 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: Please note where each ideology sits on the political spectrum. Time to move past your political bias, and give it a rest.
• 06:2506:25, 8 January 2009 diff hist +285 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: Communists are mainstream, but fascists aren't?
• 04:2904:29, 8 January 2009 diff hist +266 Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel →"Wiped off the map" or "Vanish from the pages of time" translation: This was the conference in Iran
• 02:0602:06, 8 January 2009 diff hist +558 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: Look, the material in question was actually published in two extremist sources
• 01:2401:24, 8 January 2009 diff hist −6 m Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: typo
• 01:2301:23, 8 January 2009 diff hist +421 Talk:New antisemitism →Response section: new section
• 00:5500:55, 8 January 2009 diff hist +218 Talk:New antisemitism →Edit war: Actually, your explanation above that Ali and F positions are different isn't just an assertion so sorry about that.
• 00:4500:45, 8 January 2009 diff hist +2 m Talk:New antisemitism →Edit war: I'm
• 00:4400:44, 8 January 2009 diff hist +254 Talk:New antisemitism →Edit war: Please take your own advice.

7 January 2009

• 23:0923:09, 7 January 2009 diff hist −875 New antisemitism rm Ali -what consensus? still not a RS, still repetive etc... see talk
• 22:4622:46, 7 January 2009 diff hist +4 m Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: wl
• 22:4522:45, 7 January 2009 diff hist +1,038 Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: Rather than simply asserting that Ali's opinion is "notable", sloat, perhaps you could explain why you think we should include him, rather than any number of other activists on
• 12:1812:18, 7 January 2009 diff hist +269 Talk:New antisemitism →Image issues: I still don't see what the problem is. They both have independent citations which is far beyond what is needed for images on WP.
• 12:1112:11, 7 January 2009 diff hist +592 Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: Why don't we add Ali to the further readings if he's not already there?
• 12:0112:01, 7 January 2009 diff hist −1,338 Middle East Media Research Institute rv -please see WP:SELFPUB
• 05:0605:06, 7 January 2009 diff hist +461 Talk:New antisemitism →Image issues: So is a supposed vio of UNDUE the current argument for removing it?
• 04:5804:58, 7 January 2009 diff hist +314 Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: What specific claim do you think that Ali makes which Finkelstein doesn't already cover?
• 03:5803:58, 7 January 2009 diff hist 0 m Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: not a pirate
• 03:5703:57, 7 January 2009 diff hist +499 Talk:New antisemitism →Tariq ali section: OK moving the section helps with the "last word" issue
• 03:4803:48, 7 January 2009 diff hist −920 New antisemitism rv -true that addresses the
• 03:4103:41, 7 January 2009 diff hist −1,338 Middle East Media Research Institute rv CM and Jay are correct

6 January 2009

• 09:4809:48, 6 January 2009 diff hist −2 m New antisemitism →United States: fix ws
• 09:4709:47, 6 January 2009 diff hist −948 New antisemitism →The left and anti-Zionism: rm section: #1 -not an RS. #2 -simply repeats the argumnents above in "Arguments for and against the concept". #3 looks like a silly attempt at "the last word"

24 January 2008

• 00:3800:38, 24 January 2008 diff hist +4 m Talk:Palestinians →Proposed revision: was
• 00:3700:37, 24 January 2008 diff hist +1,095 Talk:Palestinians →Proposed revision: to Steve and Padillah

23 January 2008

• 23:3623:36, 23 January 2008 diff hist +217 User talk:Armon →Revert limitation: OK well I'll go you one better. I won't edit articles at all for a month. I'll restrict myself to talk pages only.
• 23:1423:14, 23 January 2008 diff hist +103 Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/New antisemitism →Parties' agreement to mediate: #Agree.
• 23:1023:10, 23 January 2008 diff hist +104 Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Jewish lobby →Parties' agreement to mediate: #Agree.
• 23:1023:10, 23 January 2008 diff hist +484 User talk:Armon →Please withdraw your remarks: I certainly ''didn't'' intend to cause any offense by them. Sorry If you feel that way.

22 January 2008

• 03:4403:44, 22 January 2008 diff hist +133 Talk:Palestinians →8: Please try harder.
• 02:3802:38, 22 January 2008 diff hist −1,595 Jewish lobby rm Goldberg. Again, this is NOT about the term
• 01:5001:50, 22 January 2008 diff hist +514 Talk:Palestinians →Comments: Not as desperate as a personal attack on an editor who isn't even involved in this particular discussion. It's also not a strawman. Two points.
• 01:2001:20, 22 January 2008 diff hist −2 m Wikipedia talk:No original research →Interpretation of images: typo
• 01:1901:19, 22 January 2008 diff hist +882 Wikipedia talk:No original research →Interpretation of images: Well one obvious case springs to mind.