data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce07e/ce07e92440c25af2da73fa7814ac33080fbb0a03" alt="Josua P Meyer"
Josua P Meyer
Related Authors
Dr. Sumon Saha
Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology
naveen noronha
Visvesvaraya Technological University
mustafa zeki yilmazoglu
Gazi University
Maja Vasiljevic
University of Belgrade
Tudor Baracu
University Politehnica of Bucharest
Isad Saric
University of Sarajevo
Richard Crawford
The University of Texas at Austin
Chandramouli Padmanabhan
IIT Madras
Umit Unver
Yalova University
mahmoud hafiz
Al-Azhar University
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Josua P Meyer
past. In this paper, we address the fundamental question of what the size of the heat exchanger
should be, in addition to what architectural features it should have. The answer to the size question
follows from the tradeoff between (1), the useful power lost because of heat transfer and fluid flow
and (2), the power destroyed during transportation, manufacturing, and maintenance. Changes in
heat exchanger size induce changes in the opposite sign in the power requirements (1), and (2).
This fundamental tradeoff regarding size is illustrated by considering one side of a heat exchanger
(one flow passage) in laminar flow and in fully rough turbulent flow, with several duct cross
sectional shapes and arrays of channels in parallel. The size tradeoff is present in heat exchanger
applications across the board, from vehicles to stationary power plants.
past. In this paper, we address the fundamental question of what the size of the heat exchanger
should be, in addition to what architectural features it should have. The answer to the size question
follows from the tradeoff between (1), the useful power lost because of heat transfer and fluid flow
and (2), the power destroyed during transportation, manufacturing, and maintenance. Changes in
heat exchanger size induce changes in the opposite sign in the power requirements (1), and (2).
This fundamental tradeoff regarding size is illustrated by considering one side of a heat exchanger
(one flow passage) in laminar flow and in fully rough turbulent flow, with several duct cross
sectional shapes and arrays of channels in parallel. The size tradeoff is present in heat exchanger
applications across the board, from vehicles to stationary power plants.