Skip to content

Conversation

@TheColorman
Copy link
Contributor

🔗 Linked issue

resolves #32890

📚 Description

Fixes typing of the useFetch response hooks so that response._data does not have the any type, but instead inherits the generic type parameter given to useFetch.

@TheColorman TheColorman requested a review from danielroe as a code owner August 7, 2025 19:05
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the type signatures of several TypeScript interfaces and type aliases related to fetch options in the Nuxt composables. A new generic type parameter, DataT, is introduced to the NitroFetchOptions interface and is propagated to the ComputedFetchOptions and UseFetchOptions types. These adjustments ensure that the data type is consistently tracked and specified throughout these option types. Additionally, a new test case is added to verify type inference when using useFetch with a generic type parameter, asserting the expected typing of the response data. No runtime logic or control flow is modified; all changes are limited to type declarations and test additions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32891

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32891

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32891

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32891

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32891

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32891

commit: f78e1ae

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32891 will not alter performance

Comparing TheColorman:ofetch-type (f78e1ae) with main (8ea3fc3)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you! 💪

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/fixtures/basic-types/app/app-types.ts (1)

114-122: Strengthen coverage: add inference, lazy variant, and error-hook assertions

To guard against future regressions, consider adding:

  • Inference without explicit generic (via typed route).
  • The lazy variant (useLazyFetch).
  • The error hook (onResponseError) which also carries response._data?: T.

Apply this diff to extend the same test:

 it('works with useFetch and generic type', () => {
   type ApiResponse = { message: string }

   useFetch<ApiResponse>('/api/v1/users', {
     onResponse ({ response }) {
       expectTypeOf(response._data).toEqualTypeOf<ApiResponse | undefined>()
     },
   })
+
+  // Inference from typed route (no explicit generic)
+  useFetch('/api/hey', {
+    onResponse ({ response }) {
+      expectTypeOf(response._data).toEqualTypeOf<{ foo: string, baz: string } | undefined>()
+    },
+  })
+
+  // Lazy variant preserves the generic
+  useLazyFetch<ApiResponse>('/api/v1/users', {
+    onResponse ({ response }) {
+      expectTypeOf(response._data).toEqualTypeOf<ApiResponse | undefined>()
+    },
+  })
+
+  // Error hook also forwards the response type
+  useFetch<ApiResponse>('/api/v1/users', {
+    onResponseError ({ response }) {
+      expectTypeOf(response._data).toEqualTypeOf<ApiResponse | undefined>()
+    },
+  })
 })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20b5851 and f78e1ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/fixtures/basic-types/app/app-types.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

Follow standard TypeScript conventions and best practices

Files:

  • test/fixtures/basic-types/app/app-types.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: nuxt/nuxt#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T16:46:07.446Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,tsx} : Follow standard TypeScript conventions and best practices
Learnt from: TheAlexLichter
PR: nuxt/nuxt#31812
File: packages/nuxt/src/components/plugins/islands-transform.ts:202-202
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T18:33:41.753Z
Learning: In Nuxt, using `rolldownVersion` (not `rollupVersion`) is intentional when detecting if rolldown-vite is being used, even though TypeScript may show an error because the property isn't in standard type definitions yet.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T16:46:07.446Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: nuxt/nuxt#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T16:46:07.446Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{test,spec}.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : Write unit tests for core functionality using `vitest`

Applied to files:

  • test/fixtures/basic-types/app/app-types.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/fixtures/basic-types/app/app-types.ts (1)

117-121: Type forwarding validated for onResponse

This correctly asserts that response._data reflects the generic ApiResponse (unioned with undefined), exercising the intended fix.

@danielroe danielroe merged commit c233382 into nuxt:main Aug 10, 2025
82 of 83 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2025
@TheColorman TheColorman deleted the ofetch-type branch August 10, 2025 19:50
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

useFetch response hooks lose generic type information, response._data typed as any

2 participants