Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;88(6):1722S-1732S.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.25825C.

High-fructose corn syrup: is this what's for dinner?

Affiliations

High-fructose corn syrup: is this what's for dinner?

Kiyah J Duffey et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Research on trends in consumption of added sugar and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the United States has largely focused on calorically sweetened beverages and ignored other sources.

Objective: We aimed to examine US consumption of added sugar and HFCS to determine long-term trends in availability and intake from beverages and foods.

Design: We used 2 estimation techniques and data from the Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys (1965 and 1977), Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (1989-1991), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1999-2000, 2001-2002, and 2003-2004) to examine trends in HFCS and added sugar both overall and within certain food and beverage groups.

Results: Availability and consumption of HFCS and added sugar increased over time until a slight decline between 2000 and 2004. By 2004, HFCS provided roughly 8% of total energy intake compared with total added sugar of 377 kcal x person(-1) x d(-1), accounting for 17% of total energy intake. Although food and beverage trends were similar, soft drinks and fruit drinks provided the most HFCS (158 and 40 kcal x person(-1) x d(-1) in 2004, respectively). Moreover, among the top 20% of individuals, 896 kcal x person(-1) x d(-1) of added sugar was consumed compared with 505 kcal x person(-1) x d(-1) of HFCS. Among consumers, sweetened tea and desserts also represented major contributors of calories from added sugar (>100 kcal x person(-1) x d(-1)).

Conclusion: Although increased intake of calories from HFCS is important to examine, the health effect of overall trends in added caloric sweeteners should not be overlooked.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Range of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in selected food groups derived from two methods* of estimation *NCC method (measured fructose values) and Glinsmann method (HFCS availability data). † Right-hand axis refers to estimated calories of HFCS from cereal, breads, snacks and dressings only. Left-hand axis refers to estimated calories of HFCS for desserts only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trends in fructose and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) availability* in the U.S., 1970–2004 *Data from reference (45)
Figure 3
Figure 3
High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and added sugar consumption* by age group and year *Data are from NFCS 1965 (beverages & foods, n=13,549), CSFII 1989–91 (beverages, n=14,689), and NHANES 1999–2000 (foods, n=8,173) and 2003–2004 (beverages and foods, n=8,275); results use survey designs to account for clustering, and are weighted to be nationally representative.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calories of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and added sugar* from selected food and beverage groups. *Data are from NFCS 1965 (beverages & foods, n=13,549), CSFII 1989–91 (beverages, n=14,689), and NHANES 1999–2000 (foods, n=8,173) and 2003–2004 (beverages and foods, n=8,275); results use survey designs to account for clustering, and are weighted to be nationally representative.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calories of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and added sugar* from selected food and beverage groups *Data are from NFCS 1965 (beverages & foods, n=13,549), CSFII 1989–91 (beverages, n=14,689), and NHANES 1999–2000 (foods, n=8,173) and 2003–2004 (beverages and foods, n=8,275); results use survey designs to account for clustering, and are weighted to be nationally representative.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vartanian L, Schwartz M, Brownell K. Effects of Soft drink Consumption on Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Public Health. 2007;97 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, Chomitz VR, Ellenbogen SJ, Ludwig DS. Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:673–680. - PubMed
    1. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:274–288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:205–210. - PubMed
    1. Popkin BM, Nielsen SJ. The sweetening of the world's diet. Obes Res. 2003;11:1325–1332. - PubMed

MeSH terms