Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Nov 26, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025
(currently open for review and needs more reviewers - can you help?)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Toward a Mental Health Counseling System: A Bibliometric and Qualitative Analysis of Dialogue Systems for Mental Health
ABSTRACT
Background:
The importance of mental health has been increasingly highlighted, yet many individuals still face barriers to accessing suitable interventions. Although AI-based dialogue systems for mental health enhancement have advanced notably to address this issue, comprehensive surveys in this area, particularly those considering studies that adopt large language models (LLMs), remain scarce.
Objective:
This study aims to conduct a quantitative and qualitative review of current research trends in AI-driven dialogue systems for enhancing mental health.
Methods:
This study performed a bibliometric analysis and a trend review analysis of AI-driven dialogue systems for mental health, covering literature from 2020 to May 2024 across three citation databases—WoS, Scopus, and ACM Digital Library. The bibliometric analysis statistically assessed the distribution of publications, while the qualitative trend review focused on three key areas: (i) highly cited publications, (ii) those using the ESConv dataset, and (iii) those employing LLMs.
Results:
We reviewed 146 papers published between 2020 and 2024, observing a steady increase in publications over the last five years. Our bibliometric analysis examined publication distribution across sources, countries, institutions, and authors, while keyword network analysis highlighted major themes. Most of the top 10 highly cited papers focused on empathetic response generation, incorporating psychological approaches within deep learning models. For the ESConv dataset’s application in counseling, prominent techniques included multi-task learning and the integration of external knowledge. Lastly, we identified notable advantages of LLMs over traditional deep learning models and explored strategies to overcome their limitations as counseling tools.
Conclusions:
Our study identifies key areas for developing counseling dialogue systems, such as incorporating psychological knowledge, improving data access, applying LLMs, and refining evaluation methods. By examining current research trends and establishing a foundational framework, this work offers future directions to enhance the effectiveness of AI counseling systems, contributing to both the machine learning and psychology fields.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.