In T379637#10335824, @Bachounda wrote:

Dans T379637#10321113, @ZhaoFJx a écrit :

I am not sure how will the Wikimedia API check this. Babel information can be easily professed, maybe the homewiki?

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Userinfo

Glad to know, thanks.

Thanks to Deadbeef :-)

Community suggeted three proposals, just for reference:

1. Separate the two permissions of "securepoll-create-poll" and "securepoll-view-voter-pii" and grant them to different usergroups.
2. All extended confirmed users can access the vote count datas, but only electionadmin can access the CU datas.
3. Grant securepoll-create-poll directly to sysops, and only grant the sensitive view-voter-pii to supervisors.

1 and 3 can be tracked at T377531.

Language: Checks if at least one of the user’s languages matches the criteria.

@ifried The patch has been deployed and looks good. You can find the event organizer policy at here. Cheers!

It doesn't looks difficult, I will do it now so reduce the backlog then

@ifried Thank you for this good news! If my patch looks ok by the team members, I'll schedule a deploy on next Monday.

Thanks for summary @A2569875 ! Since I know nothing about Collection extensions, I'm guessing the current delay seems to be due to unresolved errors: "{"flow-workflow":"to254sl899rx7ayx"}" and temporary PDF function disabled. Also I found that currently only pediapress printing is available in that special book page, so I am not sure about organizing feature they mentioned would be possible.

If their communities agrees, they can mirror all sysops from a related larger project (such as Wikipedia) without needing a dedicated sysop election (as well as additional locally elected sysops).

The prerequisite is that these sysops also agree to become a administrators of the small wiki.
Unless you want to grant permissions to hundreds of users at once, why not simply consider asking local bureaucrats to grant them user groups? It would be much easier.

Considering that book creator cannot currently be downloaded as pdf, @Shizhao is the community still willing to deploy it? After all there is already a "download as pdf" option on the sidebar. Thanks.

Thanks @ifried, no rush and take your time :)

Hi @ifried, I just want to check if internal request has passed. Thanks!

I made some changes, hoping it would work.

Cheers! Thank you to everyone, it's a pleasure to work with you! We will let you know if we need any help ;-)

@ifried Thanks for confirmation. I will try my best to contact an available admin to help out.

@ifried and @Venuslui , I have let the sysops know this at the noticeboard and asked the community to help with the translation. Thank you for working on this!

@ifried Thank you for your patience, I was waiting for more comments, but since there are no opposition opinion about your proposal after 8 days, it is believed community passed the proposal :)

Thanks for your questions. Self-removal of permissions is like a convention, and there was a discussion that led to a consensus. For example, if the person who granted permissions wanted to resign, they can do it without bother sysops. It is not a urgent request.

@ifried the community has reached consensus, you can find it at this discussion.

@ifried Thanks for following up. I will let you know asap after the community discussion;)

As per to community consensus, allow event-organizer remove their user group by themself. Thanks!
Waiting for further discussion.

// wgGroupsRemoveFromSelf
'+zhwiki' => [
	'event-organizer' => [ 'event-organizer' ], // T373821
	],

Hi @ifried , no problem, and thank you for working on this:)

Seems deployment is overdue. May we know when will Vector 2022 be officially deployed to zh-wiki, please?