The Joker vs. Arthur Fleck:-

🃏 One of my friends asked me to stop watching any other movie and emphasized the need to start writing a review, especially after opinions have recently been divided and the debate has intensified. In this mini-review , I will provide a comprehensive reading of the live portrayal of the Joker by presenting several different viewpoints:
1️⃣ The first opinion includes those who dislike it as much as any musical film, viewing musicals as inferior. They see cinema as mere storytelling, while others appreciate it as a vibrant art form!
2️⃣ The second opinion criticizes the film for its slow pace and lack of events. Fans of the first film expected a similar high-energy sequel. When they found a different genre , they rejected it!
3️⃣ The third opinion, more mature, posits that the sequel is a tedious explanation of the misunderstood first film. The director's intention was to highlight that Joker’s actions are unjustifiable, yet many viewers empathized with the character. This suggests that audiences misinterpreted the first film, leading to the second being a redundant clarification!
4️⃣ On my point of view, I suggest that the issue lies in the first film's expression rather than the audience's understanding. The first story of Arthur Fleck depicts a man facing significant social and psychological challenges without sufficient support , while the sequel is not merely a repetition but a re-examination of Arthur's character and a necessary correction to its flawed expression, shifting the focus inward after previously externalizing his struggles "The Joker vs. Arthur Fleck" emphasizing responsibility for one’s actions. Therefore, the sequel better captures the complex relationship between the character and society, presenting a more mature narrative!
Stay tuned for my Summary and thanks for reading🤡^^