-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing #215
Comments
This is also covered in test that should be updated appropriately: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/IndexedDB/keypath-special-identifiers.htm#L43 |
It looks like Firefox has managed to unship |
HTTPArchive searches are pretty much useless here since it's very common property name used by developers (e.g. JIRA records). We'll need to instrument in Chrome to determine usage. |
Are you looking for usage of (and the chrome bug does indeed mention that Firefox was going to remove lastModifiedDate in FF 61) |
TPAC 2019 Web Apps Indexed DB triage notes: Delete it from the spec, then it's just a Chrome problem. Good luck, Chrome. (Oh wait....) |
The Firefox timeline on this is:
|
Several browsers used to implement a nonstandard lastModifiedDate property on File objects. This has been removed everywhere except Chrome, and it's not in the File API spec. This specification included special cases for keypath evaluation of that property name, and it wasn't tested. Remove the references. Closes #215
Several browsers used to implement a nonstandard lastModifiedDate property on File objects. This has been removed everywhere except Chrome, and it's not in the File API spec. This specification included special cases for keypath evaluation of that property name, and it wasn't tested. Remove the references. Closes #215
There's a clause for evaluating keypaths on File objects with the "lastModifiedDate" property. That property is only implemented in some browsers (Chrome, Firefox, maybe Edge?, but not Safari) but is not in the https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/ standard.
This should be reconciled - either spec it or remove it from IDB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: