I am not sure if this is what we want for our ref composables. Passing a ref/reactive to ref() does normally return the ref/reactive itself directly. Perhaps we should consider a option to make them deep. 🤔

I am not sure if this is what we want for our ref composables. Passing a ref/reactive to ref() does normally return the ref/reactive itself directly. Perhaps we should consider a option to make them deep. 🤔

Maybe this will be helpful: #5115 (comment)

I see. However, I think we should only document that this function is shallow, rather than the reactive workaround.

I see. However, I think we should only document that this function is shallow, rather than the reactive workaround.

I totally agree, add a workaround in official document might confuse or mislead users since this approach might not be the best choice for user.
Therefore I have made changes at commit 9c0da39 , please review it, thank you.