Acceptance Tests: Guidance on [aria-*]
attributes
#663
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When exercising pages that implement behaviors through custom or
third-party widgets, tests might locate elements or drive actions based
on CSS classes (e.g.
.expanded
or.collapsed
) or[data-*]
attributes (e.g.
[data-disclosure-toggled-value="true"]
or[data-test-id="toggle-widget"]
).While these techniques can be helpful work-arounds that exercise the
page, they're low-fidelity alternatives to end-users experiences.
When widgets cannot be exercised by Capybara's suite of selectors or
matchers like
click_on
, test authors should rely on the same sets ofWAI-ARIA compliant attributes that assistive technologies would expect.
For example, if an application's constraints obstruct the author from
implementing a "checkbox" form control with an
<input type="checkbox">
, the tests that drive the alternative should "check" aform control with the
[role="checkbox"]
attribute, assert changes toits
[aria-checked]
attribute, and conform to any of the other expectedattributes and behaviors outlined by the WAI ARIA Authoring
Practices.