Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add useSelector to xstate-svelte #2614

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 4, 2021
Merged

Add useSelector to xstate-svelte #2614

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 4, 2021

Conversation

DavKato
Copy link
Contributor

@DavKato DavKato commented Sep 4, 2021

This PR adds useSelector functiont to xstate-svelte.

<script>
  // It won't be updated unless the selected value changed.
  const value = useSelector(service, (state) => state.context.value);
</script>

<p>{$value}</p>

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 4, 2021

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 0f77ec3

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@xstate/svelte Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

>(
actor: TActor,
selector: (emitted: TEmitted) => T,
compare: (a: T, b: T) => boolean = defaultCompare
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a missing 4th argument getSnapshot compared to @xstate/react.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's fine for that to be added later or emitted; actors passed into useSelector should adhere to the ActorRef interface (i.e., it's not compatible with other things), so when I added getSnapshot as an option, I think I was being too flexible 😓

@davidkpiano davidkpiano merged commit b0d268e into statelyai:main Sep 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants