Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify batch and stream API check #271
Unify batch and stream API check #271
Changes from 1 commit
1febfb3
4dc2cee
1c65524
5358b35
28f6dee
aed889d
0bec44f
5e8c697
1c3eda9
10f7b0f
b57a6b5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the documentation says that this returns:
But this code suggests that it returns
-(some_cufile_op_error - CUFILEOP_BASE_ERR)
. Which can't be right given the above because it value-punsCU_FILE_DRIVER_NOT_INITIALIZED
with an IO error.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the docs are correct. I now just print the raw value of
_nbytes
. Let's fix this in a follow-up when we know the intended behavior :)