Fix some type declarations #47
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Zulu-Inuoe
reviewed
Dec 1, 2020
som/src/lvq_pak.lisp
Outdated
| @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ | |||
| (current :accessor entries-current :initarg :current :initform 0 | |||
| :documentation "index of current data-entry inside data-entries") | |||
| (entries :accessor entries-entries :initarg :entries :initform nil | |||
| :type #-ccl cons #+ccl list | |||
| :type #-ccl (or null cons) #+ccl list | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This can just be updated to be :type list and get rid of the #-ccl and #+ccl since (or null cons) is === list
This allows compiling with SBCL 2.0.11 which is less tolerant with wrong type declarations.
|
Is this ready to be merged? I came across similiar problems, and fixed some things on my own. But not in such a good way as here. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows compiling with SBCL 2.0.11 which is less tolerant with wrong type declarations.
Fixes issue #45