Skip to content

Don't relate unmatched parameter positions in signatures #41308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ahejlsberg merged 3 commits into from
Oct 28, 2020
Merged

Don't relate unmatched parameter positions in signatures #41308

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
60298ed
Don't relate unmatched parameter positions in signatures
ahejlsberg Oct 28, 2020
b3b3948
Add regression test
ahejlsberg Oct 28, 2020
ca37621
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg Oct 28, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Don't relate unmatched parameter positions in signatures
  • Loading branch information
@ahejlsberg
ahejlsberg committed Oct 28, 2020
commit 60298ed3ea20ebff358bab04e99fd5811f48369b
58 changes: 30 additions & 28 deletions src/compiler/checker.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16156,36 +16156,38 @@ namespace ts {
const restIndex = sourceRestType || targetRestType ? paramCount - 1 : -1;

for (let i = 0; i < paramCount; i++) {
const sourceType = i === restIndex ? getRestTypeAtPosition(source, i) : getTypeAtPosition(source, i);
const targetType = i === restIndex ? getRestTypeAtPosition(target, i) : getTypeAtPosition(target, i);
// In order to ensure that any generic type Foo<T> is at least co-variant with respect to T no matter
// how Foo uses T, we need to relate parameters bi-variantly (given that parameters are input positions,
// they naturally relate only contra-variantly). However, if the source and target parameters both have
// function types with a single call signature, we know we are relating two callback parameters. In
// that case it is sufficient to only relate the parameters of the signatures co-variantly because,
// similar to return values, callback parameters are output positions. This means that a Promise<T>,
// where T is used only in callback parameter positions, will be co-variant (as opposed to bi-variant)
// with respect to T.
const sourceSig = checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback ? undefined : getSingleCallSignature(getNonNullableType(sourceType));
const targetSig = checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback ? undefined : getSingleCallSignature(getNonNullableType(targetType));
const callbacks = sourceSig && targetSig && !getTypePredicateOfSignature(sourceSig) && !getTypePredicateOfSignature(targetSig) &&
(getFalsyFlags(sourceType) & TypeFlags.Nullable) === (getFalsyFlags(targetType) & TypeFlags.Nullable);
let related = callbacks ?
compareSignaturesRelated(targetSig!, sourceSig!, (checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.StrictArity) | (strictVariance ? SignatureCheckMode.StrictCallback : SignatureCheckMode.BivariantCallback), reportErrors, errorReporter, incompatibleErrorReporter, compareTypes, reportUnreliableMarkers) :
!(checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback) && !strictVariance && compareTypes(sourceType, targetType, /*reportErrors*/ false) || compareTypes(targetType, sourceType, reportErrors);
// With strict arity, (x: number | undefined) => void is a subtype of (x?: number | undefined) => void
if (related && checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.StrictArity && i >= getMinArgumentCount(source) && i < getMinArgumentCount(target) && compareTypes(sourceType, targetType, /*reportErrors*/ false)) {
related = Ternary.False;
}
if (!related) {
if (reportErrors) {
errorReporter!(Diagnostics.Types_of_parameters_0_and_1_are_incompatible,
unescapeLeadingUnderscores(getParameterNameAtPosition(source, i)),
unescapeLeadingUnderscores(getParameterNameAtPosition(target, i)));
const sourceType = i === restIndex ? getRestTypeAtPosition(source, i) : tryGetTypeAtPosition(source, i);
const targetType = i === restIndex ? getRestTypeAtPosition(target, i) : tryGetTypeAtPosition(target, i);
if (sourceType && targetType) {
// In order to ensure that any generic type Foo<T> is at least co-variant with respect to T no matter
// how Foo uses T, we need to relate parameters bi-variantly (given that parameters are input positions,
// they naturally relate only contra-variantly). However, if the source and target parameters both have
// function types with a single call signature, we know we are relating two callback parameters. In
// that case it is sufficient to only relate the parameters of the signatures co-variantly because,
// similar to return values, callback parameters are output positions. This means that a Promise<T>,
// where T is used only in callback parameter positions, will be co-variant (as opposed to bi-variant)
// with respect to T.
const sourceSig = checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback ? undefined : getSingleCallSignature(getNonNullableType(sourceType));
const targetSig = checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback ? undefined : getSingleCallSignature(getNonNullableType(targetType));
const callbacks = sourceSig && targetSig && !getTypePredicateOfSignature(sourceSig) && !getTypePredicateOfSignature(targetSig) &&
(getFalsyFlags(sourceType) & TypeFlags.Nullable) === (getFalsyFlags(targetType) & TypeFlags.Nullable);
let related = callbacks ?
compareSignaturesRelated(targetSig!, sourceSig!, (checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.StrictArity) | (strictVariance ? SignatureCheckMode.StrictCallback : SignatureCheckMode.BivariantCallback), reportErrors, errorReporter, incompatibleErrorReporter, compareTypes, reportUnreliableMarkers) :
!(checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.Callback) && !strictVariance && compareTypes(sourceType, targetType, /*reportErrors*/ false) || compareTypes(targetType, sourceType, reportErrors);
// With strict arity, (x: number | undefined) => void is a subtype of (x?: number | undefined) => void
if (related && checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.StrictArity && i >= getMinArgumentCount(source) && i < getMinArgumentCount(target) && compareTypes(sourceType, targetType, /*reportErrors*/ false)) {
related = Ternary.False;
}
return Ternary.False;
if (!related) {
if (reportErrors) {
errorReporter!(Diagnostics.Types_of_parameters_0_and_1_are_incompatible,
unescapeLeadingUnderscores(getParameterNameAtPosition(source, i)),
unescapeLeadingUnderscores(getParameterNameAtPosition(target, i)));
}
return Ternary.False;
}
result &= related;
}
result &= related;
}

if (!(checkMode & SignatureCheckMode.IgnoreReturnTypes)) {
Expand Down