MNT: clarify path.sketch rcparam format + test validate_sketch #26921
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
story645
changed the title
story645
changed the title
Member
|
We should just accept the sting tuple. I'd rather leave "3-tuple" in the documentation, because "triplet" is not a well-defined term. |
story645
changed the title
4 tasks
Member
Author
|
@timhoffm added tuple support |
timhoffm
reviewed
Sep 30, 2023
Co-authored-by: Tim Hoffmann <[email protected]>
timhoffm
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2023
Member
Author
|
Can this get a second review? |
ksunden
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tried to make it clearer that the rcParam format is
path:sketch: scale, length, randomness. I originally read it aspath:sketch: (scale, length, randomness)and that caused loads of test failures.This is spun off of #26854 since I think this param is worth clarifying.
It's probably more sensible to just let path.sketch take a tuple as a valid arg but this tests status quo