Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate all old direct messages to new conversations schema #9085

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2018

Conversation

Gargron
Copy link
Member

@Gargron Gargron commented Oct 24, 2018

First it creates a conversation record for every local DM's author (so everyone can keep track of DMs they sent). Then it iterates over notifications about DMs to create corresponding conversation records. This allows us to not mess with NotifyService filters on the fly, because if a notification exists, it can be shown.

@Gargron Gargron merged commit 4ea718e into master Oct 24, 2018
@Gargron Gargron deleted the feature-migrate-old-conversations branch October 24, 2018 23:44
notifications_about_direct_statuses.find_each do |notification|
AccountConversation.add_status(notification.account, notification.target_status)
end
end
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about statuses being added out-of-order?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Batch query enforces own order and it's based on id and i think it's ascending.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any local toot will still be added before any remote toot, regardless of their actual order, right?
This means that if the last toot of a conversation was a local toot, it won't actually show, and that removing toots from the conversation will lead to strange behaviors.
It also means that for servers running on master or the previous RC, old toots will pop up on top of existing conversations.

Copy link
Member Author

@Gargron Gargron Oct 25, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You forget the status_ids are sorted before being saved, so inserting out of order should be fine. Updates will be streamed though but only if you are connected to the direct stream and I think even then it's a minor one-off issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry, I can't find where they are sorted.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Notification.joins(mention: :status)
.where(activity_type: 'Mention', statuses: { visibility: :direct })
.includes(:account, mention: { status: [:account, mentions: :account] })
end
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about deleted notifications (of statuses that would still be in the DM column)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The alternative is not worth it

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know, we currently have a way to clear the notifications, so people might do that.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No I mean the alternative is running the NotifyService code which performs a lot of checks that are not optimized for n+1. It's a lot faster to iterate over already existing notifications. Also if you deleted the notifications it might be you don't wanna see those DMs anymore anyway. Overall I think it's the most optimal choice for the migration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants