-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add get_doi_csl_item_zotero functionality #161
Conversation
doi_retrievers = [ | ||
get_doi_csl_item_crosscite, | ||
get_doi_csl_item_zotero, | ||
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Switching the order such that get_doi_csl_item_zotero
is first would resolve #158. But in other cases, like for a bioRxiv preprint, the zotero metadata seems to be worse than what we get from crosscite (DOI Content Negotiation).
|
||
def test_get_doi_csl_item_zotero(): | ||
""" | ||
As of 2019-10-25, DOI Content Negotiation (i.e. crosscite) encodes the consurtium |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm reviewing old pull requests I missed originally. There's a typo there that could be cleaned up later: consurtium
-> consortium
def get_csl_item(identifier: str): | ||
""" | ||
Use a translation-server serach query followed by an export query | ||
to return a CSL Item (the first & only record of a the returned CSL JSON). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo: a the
No description provided.