Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: start adding the roadmap to 1.0. #37

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 5, 2020
Merged

doc: start adding the roadmap to 1.0. #37

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
33f4b97
doc: start adding the roadmap to 1.0.
Oct 13, 2020
caad601
run spotless
Nov 5, 2020
1ee2be5
propose renaming test models
Nov 5, 2020
ab93964
run spotless
Nov 5, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
propose renaming test models
  • Loading branch information
John Plaisted committed Nov 5, 2020
commit 1ee2be5daf473b5942548c032cedde3c82a97964
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions docs/roadmap.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -80,3 +80,6 @@ Features / improvements we need to discuss further to see if they make sense on
- The URN classes in DataHub are pretty much copy and paste. We could easily generate these classes.
- Deletion of references to snapshots and aspect unions.
- MXE v5 helps to enabled this. Allows more modular GMSes. Also allows models to no longer be in a single repo.
- Rename test models for a more grounded example.
- "Foo" and "Bar" have no meaning and can be kind of hard to read some times, and are just poor examples. Naga has
had some fun "foodie" examples in past presentations, maybe we just use that kind of thing for our test models?