Add blog post for Structured Authn beta#45106
Conversation
|
/sig auth |
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
/area blog |
|
Hi @aramase 👋🏽 I'm Frederick, a shadow from the Release Comms Team! #release-comms I hope you're doing well! Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for the Kubernetes release blog post is coming up on March 22, 2024. When you have a draft ready for review, please update the 'Blog Status' to 'Ready for Review'. Thank you so much for your time and contribution! |
|
/hold |
|
@aramase 👋 Comms Team here, following up on your feature blog post for 1.30. The Ready for Review deadline is coming up this week on March 22, 2024. Please let us know if we can help out in any way! |
ac89c7f to
f4c3640
Compare
f4c3640 to
a252c3c
Compare
a252c3c to
e8ddece
Compare
|
/assign enj |
e8ddece to
a0dec32
Compare
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-15-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-15-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-15-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-15-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <[email protected]>
fae8820 to
dffa687
Compare
|
We have a publication date now. /hold cancel |
|
@sftim @nate-double-u this PR is ready for review! PTAL |
|
/hold 🛑 Do not merge until Kubernetes v1.30 is released 🛑 |
sftim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks
Overall:
- I would talk about using a file to configure authentication, rather than about Structured Authentication Configuration
- avoid using “we” in the article as it can confuse readers about who you mean (for example, they might think you mean your employer, Microsoft)
If possible, avoid linking to the documentation. The ideal thing to do is to change the Kubernetes documentation to list the supported claim types directly so that people reading the announcement do not need to read source code.
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Wait, how does this align with #45137 ? I think we should put some work into telling readers how the two things are related. |
|
@aramase you marked some feedback as resolved, but I didn't see any fixes. I've marked it as still needing a fix. |
Please don't do that, though: it makes life harder for reviewers, who can't tell the difference between something that will be fixed, and a misclick (or something else). I'm afraid with open source it's harder than I'd like to assume helpful intent. |
Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <[email protected]>
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/en/blog/_posts/2024-04-29-structured-authentication-configuration-beta.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <[email protected]>
|
/lgtm 🛑 Do not merge until Kubernetes v1.30 is released 🛑 |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 42ca2b76e960cda0e6018504dce93ccf9f318ca2 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: enj, sftim The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Feature blog post for KEP 3331: https://git.k8s.io/enhancements/keps/sig-auth/3331-structured-authentication-configuration
KEP issue: kubernetes/enhancements#3331