Skip to content

Update Calico to v3.3.1 #70932

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2018
Merged

Conversation

caseydavenport
Copy link
Member

@caseydavenport caseydavenport commented Nov 12, 2018

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Updates Calico to version v3.3.1 and corresponding config updates.

The current version of Calico included in these scripts is quite old.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

I've also removed the MAINTAINERS.md file since that is tracked in OWNERS now.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 12, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from bowei and dnardo November 12, 2018 00:39
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 12, 2018
@caseydavenport
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fasaxc
/assign @jingax10

@fasaxc
Copy link
Contributor

fasaxc commented Nov 13, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2018
@jingax10
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve no-issue

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: caseydavenport, jingax10

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants