Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add e2e test for when a webhook does not return. #56822

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2017

Conversation

cheftako
Copy link
Member

@cheftako cheftako commented Dec 4, 2017

What this PR does / why we need it: Adding an e2e test to simulate a webhook not returning. Making sure this does not just hang the API.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Ref kubernetes/enhancements#492

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 4, 2017
@timothysc timothysc removed their assignment Dec 11, 2017
Adding code to simulate a webhook not returning.
Ensure that we verify that the returned error is a timeout.
@cheftako
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e

@jennybuckley
Copy link

lgtm (although I can't put the tag)

@cheftako cheftako changed the title [WIP] Add e2e test for when a webhook does not return. Add e2e test for when a webhook does not return. Dec 12, 2017
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 12, 2017
@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 12, 2017
@kubernetes kubernetes deleted a comment from k8s-github-robot Dec 12, 2017
@cheftako
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako, lavalamp

Associated issue: #492

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 12, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all

Tests are more than 96 hours old. Re-running tests.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56676, 57050, 54881, 56822, 57113). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 439db48 into kubernetes:master Dec 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants