"Every line of code should appear to be written by a single person, no matter the number of contributors." - Chinese Proverb.
The following document describes generic rules of writing in development languages that we use on our Front-end projects, that HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React, and Vue
The idea of this repository is not to be a complete guideline, the target is just to help developers who participate in our projects to be able to inform the coding standards used.
As this is a live document, some rules may not have been applied in old projects and changes can occur at any time.
If you are looking opportunities as Front-end Developer we are hiring!
You can check all our job opportunities and apply if you like it 😁
This is our Front-end Challenge
- 1.0 Prettier
- 1.1 Code Syntax
- 1.2 Refactoring
- 1.3 Imports
We use Prettier to format our code, and we have a shared rule to validade this
Use soft tabs with two spaces. You need to configure your editor for this.
✅ Good:
const obj = {
prop: 'value',
prop2: 'value2',
prop3: 'value3',
}
.foo {
color: red;
}
<div>
<p>Hello World</p>
</div>
❌ Bad:
const obj = {
prop: 'value',
prop2: 'value2',
prop3: 'value3',
}
.foo {
color: red;
}
<div>
<p>Hello World</p>
</div>
Refactoring makes part of JSMLover's way of being, doing it every day and task by task. We have good practices and conditions to do that, though.
if(!isWholeCodeCoveraged) return
-
We can only refactor codes that have tests (and that tests!), which means 100% coverage! This way, we can improve or code safely.
-
Keep the current tests and make them pass! Once the current code is tested and can be refactored. We must make sure that the new changes will not break the current tests.
If the data to be imported belongs to the same module/scope, use relative path.
HeaderButton.js importing style from header/styles.css
┣ 📂 src/components \
┣ ┣ 📂 header \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 components
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ 📂 Buttons
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ ┣ 📜 HeaderButton.js
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ ┣ 📜 RedirectButton.js
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ ┣ 📜 EspecificButton.js
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ 📂 Card
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ 📂 Modal
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 __tests__
┣ ┃ 📜 index.js
┣ ┃ 📜 styles.css
┣ ┃ 📜 index.stories.mdx
┣ ┃ 📜 index.spec.js
use this:
import { HeaderButtonClass } from '../../../styles'
If the data to be imported belongs to another module/scope, use an absolute path.
HeaderPopup.js
importing an enum from src/enum/errors.js
┣ 📂 src \
┣ ┣ 📂 components \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 header \
┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 components
┣ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Card
┣ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Popup
┣ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 HeaderPopup.js
┣ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 RedirectPopup.js
┣ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 EspecificPopup.js
┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 __tests__
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 styles.scss
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.stories.mdx
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.spec.js
┣ ┃ 📂 enums \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 errors.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 pages.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 routes.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 environments.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.js
use this:
import { UploadError } from '~/enums/errors.js'
The proper architecture for projects, and how to create and name files and folders.
- 2.1 File Name
- 2.2 Folder Architecture
✅ Good:
UserProfile/UserProfile.vue
UserProfile/index.js
UserProfile/index.ts
UserProfile/styles.js
UserProfile/UserProfile.scss
UserProfile/UserProfile.stories.mdx
❌ Bad:
UserProfile/component.vue
src/UserProfile.js
UserProfile/component.ts
UserProfile/style.scss
UserProfileStyles.js
UserProfile/UserProfile.mdx
Global Components should only be components used in more than one place.
For example:
┣ 📂 src/components \
┣ ┣ 📂 component \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 styles.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.spec.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 index.stories.mdx
We need to add inside pages/**/components
, for example, all components that is need used just a context or scope, like a components that be used just a some place or specific page.
If we need to used the component again in another context or page it need to be moved to src/components
.
For example:
┣ 📂 pages \
┣ ┣ 📂 Home \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 Home.js \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 Home.style.js \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 Home.spec.js \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 components \
┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 UserProfile \
┣ ┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 UserProfile.style.js \
┣ ┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 UserProfile.spec.js \
┣ ┣ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜 UserProfile.stories.mdx \
We need to add inside pages/**/{utils, helpers, context, hooks, etc...}
and use camelCase
as Naming Convention.
For example:
┣ 📂 pages \
┣ ┣ 📂 Home \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 utils \
┣ ┃ ┣ ┣ 📜 someUtils.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 helpers \
┣ ┣ ┣ ┣ 📜 someHelper.js
┣ ┃ ┣ 📂 hooks \
┣ ┣ ┣ ┣ 📜 useSomeHook.js
If we need use these files again in another context or page it need to be moved to src/{utils, helpers, context, hooks}
.
┣ 📂 src
┣ ┣ 📂 utils \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 someUtils.js
┣ ┣ 📂 helpers \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 someHelper.js
┣ ┣ 📂 hooks \
┣ ┃ ┣ 📜 useSomeHook.js
- 3.0 Commitlint
- 3.1 Commit Messages
We use Commitlint to validate our commit messages, and we have a shared rule to validade this
In order to facilitate the contribution of anyone in a project, all commit messages must be in English.
We also use conventional commit messages, that is, the commit message must be in the form of a sentence, with the first word being an action, and the rest of the sentence a describing text.
We must always commit in lower-case. We are using a shared rule to validade this.
✅ Good:
git commit -m "feat: allow provided config object to extend configs"
git commit -m "docs: correct spelling of CHANGELOG"
git commit -m "feat(lang): add the Portuguese language"
❌ Bad:
git commit -m "Add placeholder on input"
We main reference for HTML good patterns is W3C and MDN, behind these docs we could learn a lot with semantic and another good practices.
We don't guest the scope of HTML components inside page, so when we start a new component, we should use a semantic tag, like section
or article
for example, to be able to starting to use the heading tags by context.
✅ Good:
<section class="component">
<h1 class="title">Title</h1>
<p>Paragraph</p>
</section>
❌ Bad:
<div class="component">
<h4 class="title">Title</h4>
<p>Paragraph</p>
</div>
The tips above could be used in any CSS framework or preprocessor, like SCSS, Styled Components and etc
- 5.0 CSS Stylelint
- 5.1 CSS Code Syntax
- 5.2 CSS Declaration Order
- 5.3 CSS Class Names
- 5.4 CSS Good Practices
- 5.5 CSS Media Queries
- 5.6 Spacing and size of image and components
- 5.6.1 Dynamic values
- 5.6.2 Images and well defined components
- 5.7 Avoid using shorthand properties
We use Stylelint to validate our code, and we have a shared rule to validade this
Keep one declaration per line.
✅ Good:
.selector-1,
.selector-2,
.selector-3 {
...
}
❌ Bad:
.selector-1, .selector-2, .selector-3 {
...
}
Separate each ruleset by a blank line.
✅ Good:
.selector-1 {
...
}
.selector-2 {
...
}
❌ Bad:
.selector-1 {
...
}
.selector-2 {
...
}
Use lowercase and avoid specifying units is zero-values.
✅ Good:
.selector-1 {
color: #aaa;
margin: 0;
}
❌ Bad:
.selector-1 {
color: #aaaaaa;
margin: 0px;
}
The declarations should be added in alphabetical order.
✅ Good:
.selector {
background: #fff;
border: #333 solid 1px;
color: #333;
display: flex;
height: 200px;
margin: 5px;
padding: 5px;
width: 200px;
}
❌ Bad:
.selector {
padding: 5px;
height: 200px;
background: #fff;
margin: 5px;
width: 200px;
color: #333;
border: #333 solid 1px;
display: flex;
}
Keep class lowercase and use dashes to separate the classname.
✅ Good:
.page-header { ... }
❌ Bad:
.pageHeader { ... }
.page_header { ... }
Is a good idea follows a BEM naming convention to avoid conflicts with other components. If you are using CSS-in-JS like a Styled-Component, you can use BEM if you need to nesting elements inside parent.
The main pattern is use single dash to element name, double underline to element block and double dash to style modification.
✅ Good:
/* Good */
.page-header__title { ... }
.page-header--active { ... }
.button--active { ... }
❌ Bad:
.page-header-title { ... }
.page-header-active { ... }
.active { ... }
.primary { ... }
Dashes and underline serve as natural breaks in related class. Prefix class based on the closest parent or base class.
✅ Good:
.nav { ... }
.nav__item { ... }
.nav__link { ... }
❌ Bad:
.item-nav { ... }
.link-nav { ... }
Avoid giving too short names for class and always choose meaningful names that provide the class function.
✅ Good:
/* Good */
.button { ... }
.page-header { ... }
.progress-bar { ... }
❌ Bad:
.s { ... }
.btn { ... }
.ph { ... }
.block { ... }
Avoid use values like colors, spacing and etc directly in the elements, use variables instead, and it can be CSS variables or some preprocessor variables, always check the context.
✅ Good:
.button {
color: var(--color-primary);
padding: var(--space-sm);
}
❌ Bad:
.button {
color: #333;
padding: 16px;
}
Never use IDs to style elements, always use classes instead.
✅ Good:
.header { ... }
.section { ... }
❌ Bad:
#header { ... }
#section { ... }
Do not style directly the elements, it will create a lot of conflicts, always use classes instead.
✅ Good:
.form-control { ... }
.header { ... }
.section { ... }
❌ Bad:
input[type="text"] { ... }
header
section
Avoid nesting elements, because it decrease performance and increase the specificity of the CSS, always use classes instead.
✅ Good:
.navbar { ... }
.nav { ... }
.nav__item { ... }
.nav__link { ... }
❌ Bad:
.navbar ul { ... }
.navbar ul li { ... }
.navbar ul li a { ... }
Start the development with generic rules and add media queries inside scope using mobile first. Also is important keep the media queries as close to their relevant rule sets whenever possible.
✅ Good:
.navbar {
margin-bottom: var(--space);
@media (min-width: 480px) {
padding: 10px;
}
@media (min-width: 768px) {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
@media (min-width: 992px) {
position: fixed;
}
}
❌ Bad:
.navbar {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
@media (max-width: 767px) {
position: static;
padding: var(--space-sm);
}
}
Is a commom problem to use width and height or all dynamic or all hardcoded, but each one has it own purpose. We should avoid using magic numbers at all times.
"Magic numbers are those numbers that appear in code without explanation, but that 'magically' make things work." Are numbers that dont have a why, but works.
If you are using padding, margin, gap should use our Atomium tokens. Any space that override it values must be validated once our Design System is well defined around these values and our UX Teams guide must follow it. Icons, width and height that are relative to our Design System or that have sizes based on calc upon our spacing variable must also use Atomium tokens instead of magic numbers.
✅ Good:
.logout__icon {
height: var(--spacing-xxlarge);
width: var(--spacing-xxlarge);
}
.icon__button {
min-width: var(--spacing-giant);
}
❌ Bad:
.logout__icon {
height: 25px;
width: 25px;
}
.icon__button {
min-width: 34px;
}
If you are using a image, or a component that has a design size and it sizes at maximum vary from desktop/mobile, use the value of it:
✅ Good:
.shopfrom__banner {
height: 900px;
width: 480px;
@media (min-width: 991px) {
height: 740px;
width: 240px;
}
}
❌ Bad:
.shopfrom__banner {
height: calc(4 * var(--spaceing-xxxlarge);
width: calc(2 * var(--spacing-giant);
}
.shopfrom__banner {
height: 480px;
width: 170px;
@media (max-width: 746px) {
height: 740px;
width: 240px;
}
@media (max-width: 991px) {
height: 900px;
width: 320px;
}
@media (max-width: 1024px) {
height: 980px;
width: 300px;
}
}
Shorthand properties are great for reducing CSS, but they can also make the code harder to read and override. It's better to use longhand properties to make the code more readable and maintainable.
✅ Good:
.element {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
❌ Bad:
.element {
margin: 0 auto;
}
Shorthands can be used when you want to apply the same value to multiple properties.
- 6.0 JavaScript Eslint
- 6.1 Javascript Code Syntax
- 6.2 Variables
- 6.3 Descriptive validations (if)
- 6.4 Avoid multiple if's
- 6.5 Code Comments
- 6.6 Avoid errors while destructuring
- 6.7 Prefer early return
We use ESLint to validate our code, and we have a shared rule to validade this
Never use semicolons.
✅ Good:
const foo = 'bar'
const baz = 'qux'
const func = () => {}
❌ Bad:
const foo = 'bar';
const baz = 'qux';
const func = () => {};
Always use single quotes or template literals
✅ Good:
const string = 'foo'
const template = `foo`
❌ Bad:
const string = "foo"
const template = "foo"
For strict equality checks ===
should be used in favor of ==
.
✅ Good:
if (foo === 'foo') {
statement
}
❌ Bad:
if (foo == 'foo') {
statement
}
Add empty lines between blocks of code.
✅ Good:
const foo = () => {
// do something
}
const bar = () => {
// do something
}
Add empty lines between blocks of if
statements.
✅ Good:
if (foo) {
// do something
}
if (bar) {
// do something
}
❌ Bad:
if (foo) {
// do something
}
if (bar) {
// do something
}
Add empty lines between before return statements.
✅ Good:
const foo = () => {
const bar = 'bar'
return bar
}
❌ Bad:
const foo = () => {
const bar = 'bar'
return bar
}
❌ Bad:
const foo = () => {
// do something
}
const bar = () => {
// do something
}
Remove empty lines between groups of const
, let
and var
declarations, but use empty lines between the groups.
✅ Good:
const foo = 'foo'
const bar = 'bar'
let qux = 'qux'
let quux = 'quux'
❌ Bad:
const foo = 'foo'
const bar = 'bar'
let qux = 'qux'
let quux = 'quux'
Use meaningful, pronounceable, and in English variable names.
✅ Good:
const currentDate = new Date().toLocaleDateString('pt-BR')
❌ Bad:
const xpto = new Date().toLocaleDateString('pt-BR')
Creating const to describe validations.
✅ Good:
const hasFullUserName = user.firstName && user.lastname
if (hasFullUserName) {
//do awesome something
}
❌ Bad:
if (user.firstName && user.lastname) {
//do something
}
Use an execution map instead a multiple if validations.
✅ Good:
const messagingChannels = {
whatsapp: (message) => {
// send message to whatsapp
},
email: (message) => {
// send message to email
}
}
const sendMessage = (message, channel) => {
const send = messagingChannels[channel];
return send && send(message);
}
❌ Bad:
const sendWhatsapp = (message) => {
// send message to whatsapp
}
const sendEmail = (message) => {
// send message to email
}
const sendMessage = (message, channel) => {
if (channel === 'whatsapp') {
sendWhatsapp(message)
} else if (channel === 'email') {
sendEmail(message)
}
}
Avoid writing comments to explain the code. Use comments to answer “Why?” instead “How?”. Some cases you could write a code comment: warnings, complex expressions, or unusual decision clarification.
✅ Good:
const TIME_IN_SECONDS = 60 * 40 // 40 minutes
// [email protected]
const regex = /^[a-z0-9.]+@[a-z0-9]+\.[a-z]+\.([a-z]+)?$/i
const calculateProductsPrice = () => {
// do something
}
❌ Bad:
// This coolFunction calculates the prices of the products
const coolFunction = () => {
// do something
}
Its a common mistake destructuring while the object is null or undefined, the destructuring will throw an error.
✅ Good:
const { age } = { ...null } // undefined
const { age } = null || {} // undefined
// other values won't throw an error
const { emptyString } = '';
const { nan } = NaN;
const { emptyObject } = {};
function foo(bar = {}) {
const { age } = bar;
}
foo() // undefined
❌ Bad:
const { age } = null // will throw an typeError
const { age } = undefined // will throw an typeError
Prefer early return over conditional wrapping to enhance code readability and reduce nesting.
✅ Good:
function foo() {
if (!someValidation) return // or throw error
// do something here
if (!anotherValidation) return
return 'bar'
}
❌ Bad:
function foo() {
if (someValidation) {
// do something here
if (anotherValidation) {
return 'bar'
}
}
}
- 7.1 Keys in lists
- 7.2 useState functional updates
- 7.3 useEffect dependencies array
- 7.4 Readable components
- 7.5 Styled Component Naming Convention
- 7.6 Using Styled Component in React Components
- 7.7 Enums
- 7.8 Using spread operator
- 7.9 Conditional Rendering
- 7.9.1 Using short circuit
- 7.9.2 Using ternary operator
- 7.10 Enforce Boolean Attribute Notation in JSX
The best way to pick a key is to use a string that uniquely identifies a list item among its siblings.
It is not recommended to use indexes for keys if the order of items can change. This can negatively affect performance and can cause problems with the component's state.
✅ Good:
array.map((item, index) => <Component key={item.id} {...item}>)
❌ Bad:
array.map((item, index) => <Component key={index} {...item}>)
If the new state is calculated using the previous state, you can pass a function to setState. Thus avoiding competition between states and preventing possible bugs.
✅ Good:
const [number, setNumber] = useState(1)
return (
<div>
<h1>{number}</h1>
<button onClick={() => setNumber((prevNumber) => prevNumber + 1)}>
Increase
</button>
<button onClick={() => setNumber((prevNumber) => prevNumber - 1)}>
Decrease
</button>
</div>
)
❌ Bad:
const [number, setNumber] = useState(1)
return (
<div>
<h1>{number}</h1>
<button onClick={() => setNumber(number + 1)}>Increase</button>
<button onClick={() => setNumber(number - 1}>Decrease</button>
</div>
)
Use the useEffect dependency array to trigger side effects, and make your code cleaner.
✅ Good:
const [page, setPage] = useState(1)
useEffect(() => {
requestListUser()
// calls useEffect when page state changes
}, [page])
return (
<div>
<button onClick={() => setPage((prevState) => prevState + 1)}>
Next Page
</button>
</div>
)
❌ Bad:
const [page, setPage] = useState(1)
useEffect(() => {
requestListUser()
}, [])
const requestListUser = () => {
setPage((prevState) => prevState + 1)
// ...
// any code to return user list
}
return (
<div>
<button onClick={() => requestListUser()}>Next Page</button>
</div>
)
Avoid creating very large components. If possible divided into sub-components, improving the understanding and reading of the code.
✅ Good:
const Screen = () => (
<Container>
<Header>
<Title />
<Button background="black">Filter</Button>
</Header>
<Main>
<List>
{data.map((item) => (
<Card key={item.id} name={item.name} />
))}
</List>
</Main>
</Container>
)
❌ Bad:
const Screen = () => (
<Box padding={1}>
<Box alignItems="center">
<Text>Titulo</Text>
<Button background="black">Filter</Button>
</Box>
<Box marginTop={5}>
<Box>
{data.map((item) => (
<Box key={item.id}>
<Text color="red">{item.name}</Text>
</Box>
))}
</Box>
</Box>
</Box>
)
Use PascalCase as a convention in styled-components
✅ Good:
export const CustomText = styled.p`
color: 'red'
`
❌ Bad:
export const customText = styled.p`
color: 'red'
`
Import Styled Component as S
✅ Good:
import * as S from './styles'
const MyComponent = () => (
<S.CustomText>
text example
</S.CustomText>
)
❌ Bad:
import * as Style from './styles'
const MyComponent = () => (
<Style.CustomText>
text example
</Style.CustomText>
)
import { CustomText } from './styles'
const MyComponent = () => (
<CustomText>
text example
</CustomText>
)
When know all possible values we can use enum to achieve better readability and control.
✅ Good:
const FEEDBACK = {
CORRECT: 'correct',
INCORRECT: 'incorrect',
}
const MyComponent = (type) => {
const text = type === FEEDBACK.CORRECT ? '😎' : '😢'
return (
<Emoji>
{text}
</Emoji>
)
}
❌ Bad:
const MyComponent = (type) => {
const text = type === 'correct' ? '😎' : '😢'
return (
<Emoji>
{text}
</Emoji>
)
}
When creating a component wrapper we can spread the types from our original component. That way the wrapper extends all the props from the original component automatically. This is useful to avoid creating a custom interface for our wrapper with missing props from the original component.
✅ Good:
import { MenuItem, TextField } from '@mui/material';
import { TextFieldProps } from '@mui/material';
export type SelectOption = { value: string; label: string, id: string, };
export type SelectProps = TextFieldProps & {
options: SelectOption[];
};
const Select = ({ options, ...props }: SelectProps) => {
return (
<TextField {...props}>
{options.map((option) => (
<MenuItem key={option.id} value={option.value}>
{option.label}
</MenuItem>
))}
</TextField>
);
};
❌ Bad:
import { MenuItem, TextField } from '@mui/material';
export type SelectOption = { value: string; label: string, id: string, };
export type SelectProps = {
options: SelectOption[];
disabled: boolean;
onChange: () => void;
value: string;
onBlur: () => void;
};
const Select = ({
options,
disabled,
onChange,
value,
onBlur,
} : SelectProps) => {
return (
<TextField
disabled={disabled}
onChange={handleOnChange}
value={value}
onBlur={handleOnBlur}
>
{options.map((option) => (
<MenuItem key={option.id} value={option.value}>
{option.label}
</MenuItem>
))}
</TextField>
);
};
when we only need to validate a logical case and return a component, we can directly use the short circuit
✅ Good:
import { useState } from 'react'
import Welcome from '../components/Welcome'
const HomePage = () => {
const [showWelcome, setShowWelcome] = useState(true)
return showWelcome && <Welcome />
};
❌ Bad:
import { useState } from 'react'
import Welcome from '../components/Welcome'
const HomePage = () => {
const [showWelcome, setShowWelcome] = useState(true)
return showWelcome ? <Welcome /> : <></>
};
when we need to validate two logical cases and return a component in both cases, we can use the ternary instead of the if...else
✅ Good:
import { useState } from 'react'
import Welcome from '../components/Welcome'
import Dashboard from '../components/Dashboard'
const HomePage = () => {
const [showWelcome, setShowWelcome] = useState(false)
return showWelcome ? <Welcome /> : <Dashboard />
};
❌ Bad:
import { useState } from "react"
import Welcome from "../components/Welcome"
import Dashboard from "../components/Dashboard"
const HomePage = () => {
const [showWelcome, setShowWelcome] = useState(false)
if (!showWelcome) {
return <Dashboard />
}
return <Welcome />
};
Consistently pass the value for boolean attributes in JSX to ensure clarity and readability.
✅ Good:
<Input type="text" disabled={true} />
❌ Bad:
<Input type="text" disabled />
- 8.1 Keys in lists
- 8.2 Use Computed for real time updates
- 8.3 Multi-word component names
- 8.4 Prop definitions
- 8.5 Vue property decorator
The best way to pick a key is to use a string that uniquely identifies a list item among its siblings.
It is not recommended to use indexes for keys if the order of items can change. This can negatively affect performance and can cause problems with the component's state.
✅ Good:
<template v-for="item in items">
<Component :key="item.id" v-bind="{...item}">
</template>
❌ Bad:
<template v-for="(item, index) in items">
<Component :key="index" v-bind="{...item}">
</template>
If you need listen changes at data use computeds instead of methods
✅ Good:
computed: {
fullName(){
return `${this.name} ${this.lastName}`
}
}
❌ Bad:
methods: {
fullName() {
this.fullName = `${this.name} ${this.lastName}`
}
}
Component names should always be multi-word, except for root App components, and built-in components provided by Vue.
This prevents conflicts with existing and future HTML elements, since all HTML elements are a single word.
✅ Good:
export default {
name: 'TodoItem',
// ...
}
❌ Bad:
export default {
name: 'Todo',
// ...
}
In committed code, prop definitions should always be as detailed as possible, specifying at least type(s).
✅ Good:
export default {
status: {
type: String,
required: true
}
// ...
}
❌ Bad:
export default {
props: ['status']
// ...
}
Vue prop decorator should not be used, use Vue.extend instead
✅ Good:
<script lang="ts">
import Vue from 'vue'
export default Vue.extend({
name: 'MyComponent',
})
</script>
❌ Bad:
<script lang="ts">
import { Component, Vue } from 'vue-property-decorator'
@Component({})
export default class MyComponent extends Vue {
name: 'MyComponent'
}
</script>
- 9.1 Story file
Create a file with the same name of your component, or index, and with the suffix .stories.mdx
.
✅ Good:
- Button.stories.mdx
- Dialog/index.stories.mdx
❌ Bad:
- Input.mdx
- Dialog/index.mdx
- 10.1 Write tests with "it"
- 10.2 Using test-id
- 10.3 Selecing component
Write tests with the alias "it" instead "test" method.
✅ Good:
describe('yourModule', () => {
it('should do this thing', () => {});
});
❌ Bad:
describe('yourModule', () => {
test('if it does this thing', () => {});
});
To get components during tests we use test-id
custom html attributes with unique id and our own convention deeply inpired by the css's BEM.
To define the test-id
to a component use the follow structure: [page-name||component-name]__[element-type]--[type]
✅ Good:
- forgot-password__input--email
- header__select--cnpjList
- login__button--forgot-password
❌ Bad:
- forgot-email-input
- header__cnpjList
- button--forgot-password
To select a component in order to test a behavior of to trigger any event we must use ou test-id
attribute to select it.
✅ Good:
describe('yourModule', () => {
it('should do trigger click event', () => {
const button = wrapper.find('[data-testid="login__button--forgot-password"]')
});
});
❌ Bad:
describe('yourModule', () => {
it('should do trigger click event', () => {
const button = wrapper.find('button.btn-primary')
});
});
- 11.1 Do not use any type
- 11.2 Naming convention
- 11.3 Exporting types
- 11.4 Types within a file
- 11.5 Increase legible
- 11.6 Type or Interface
Avoid using any
type. It's best to use the type that is more specific whenever possible. Prefer to use unknown
when necessary.
✅ Good:
function foo(x: unknown) {}
function foo(): unknown {}
❌ Bad:
function foo(x: any) {}
function foo(): any {}
For convention, use PascalCase for type names.
✅ Good:
type MyBeautifulType = {
name: string
age: number
}
❌ Bad:
type myBeautifulType = {
name: string
age: number
}
The same to Enum keys.
✅ Good:
enum UserResponse {
NotSuccess = 0,
Success = 1,
}
❌ Bad:
enum UserResponse {
NOT_SUCCESS = 0,
success = 1,
}
Do not export types/functions unless you need to use it across multiple components.
Within a file, type definitions should come first.
✅ Good:
// imports...
type MyBeautifulType = {
name: string
age: number
}
// rest of the file...
❌ Bad:
// imports...
// part of the file...
type MyBeautifulType = {
name: string
age: number
}
// rest of the file...
Create a type for increase legible
✅ Good:
type PersonType = {
name: string
age: number
birthDate: string
};
const Person = ({ name, age, birthDate }: PersonType) => {
// ...
};
❌ Bad:
const Person = ({
name,
age,
birthDate,
}: {
name: string,
age: number,
birthDate: string,
}) => {
// ...
};
We use type
when its usage is inside the same file and interface
when it is exported.
✅ Good:
type ProductType = {
name: string
code: number
value: string
};
export interface OrderList {
orderNumber: number
seller: string
products: ProductType[]
}
❌ Bad:
interface ProductType {
name: string
code: number
value: string
};
export type OrderList = {
orderNumber: number
seller: string
products: ProductType[]
}
We follow the principle the official TypeScript doc:
For publicly exposed types, it's a better call to make them an interface.