Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(llm-proxy): Update docker image to main-v1.46.2 #504

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

creatorrr
Copy link
Contributor

@creatorrr creatorrr commented Sep 18, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 7ff770e

fix(llm-proxy): update Docker image to main-v1.46.2

Summary:

Update litellm service image in docker-compose.yml to main-v1.46.2.

Key points:

  • Docker Image Update:
    • Updates litellm service image in docker-compose.yml from ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:main-stable to ghcr.io/berriai/litellm-database:main-v1.46.2.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 7ff770e in 11 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. llm-proxy/docker-compose.yml:5
  • Draft comment:
    The image name change from ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:main-stable to ghcr.io/berriai/litellm-database:main-v1.46.2 seems incorrect. The service litellm should likely use the litellm image, not litellm-database. Please verify the intended image name.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The comment is speculative as it asks for verification of the intended image name, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or verification. The change in the image name is a definite change in the diff, but the comment does not provide a clear, actionable issue that needs to be addressed. It is more of a suggestion to verify, which is not useful according to the rules.
    I might be missing the context of why the image name was changed, but the comment does not provide any concrete evidence that the change is incorrect. It is speculative and not actionable.
    Even if the image name change seems unusual, the comment does not provide a clear reason why it is incorrect, making it speculative. The rules clearly state not to ask for verification or confirmation.
    The comment should be removed because it is speculative and asks for verification, which is against the rules. It does not provide a clear, actionable issue.

Workflow ID: wflow_3URPfu8o5fMkJKht


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 merged commit 8e690f3 into dev Sep 18, 2024
4 of 7 checks passed
@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 deleted the x/fix-broken-litellm-images branch September 18, 2024 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants