f/task tests #458
Merged
f/task tests #458
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to b50be03 in 55 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1930lines of code in49files - Skipped
2files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_acOnCp4UHmxiuAKC
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| "cancelled": "cancelled", | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| def validate_transition_targets(data: CreateTransitionRequest) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The validation logic for transition targets is duplicated in the validate_transition_targets function and the create_execution_transition function. Consider consolidating this logic to ensure consistency and reduce maintenance overhead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 083b089 in 39 seconds
More details
- Looked at
924lines of code in17files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/transition_step.py:18
- Draft comment:
The function signature fortransition_stepincorrectly usesStepContext[None]. This should be replaced with a more specific step context type to ensure proper handling of step-related data.
async def transition_step(
context: StepContext[CreateTransitionRequest],
transition_info: CreateTransitionRequest,
) -> None:
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting a code change to improve type specificity, which is a valid concern for code quality. UsingStepContext[None]might be too generic and could lead to issues if specific step-related data is expected. The comment is actionable and clear, suggesting a specific improvement to the code.
The comment assumes thatStepContext[None]is incorrect without knowing the context of its use. It might be intentional to use a generic type if no specific data is needed. The comment could be speculative if the current type is indeed appropriate for the function's purpose.
Even ifStepContext[None]is intentional, the comment highlights a potential area for improvement in type specificity, which is generally beneficial for code quality. It's worth considering if a more specific type could enhance the code.
The comment should be kept as it suggests a specific improvement to the code's type specificity, which is a valid concern for code quality.
Workflow ID: wflow_X2PtQ5CJZYFl55TA
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 86e51a7 in 43 seconds
More details
- Looked at
465lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/transition_step.py:36
- Draft comment:
Thetransition_stepfunction should explicitly return a value, even if it's justNone, to ensure clarity in the workflow execution.
return None
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The function is an asynchronous function with a return type ofNone, which means it is not expected to return any value. In Python, if a function does not explicitly return a value, it implicitly returnsNone. Addingreturn Noneis not necessary for the function to work correctly, and it does not improve code quality significantly. The suggestion does not address a code change that is required, as the function is already correctly defined to returnNoneimplicitly.
The suggestion might be seen as a minor improvement for code clarity, but it does not address a necessary change. The function's behavior is already clear from its type hint, and the implicit return ofNoneis a common Python practice.
While addingreturn Nonecould be seen as a minor improvement for explicitness, it is not a necessary change and does not align with the rules for commenting on code changes.
The comment suggesting an explicit return statement is not necessary and does not align with the rules for commenting on code changes. It should be removed.
Workflow ID: wflow_5fEwEOFD5cCzUJXK
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on f00b6b1 in 1 minute and 33 seconds
More details
- Looked at
378lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/routers/docs/create_doc.py:45
- Draft comment:
Therun_embed_docs_taskfunction is missing thedeveloper_idparameter in the call toEmbedDocsWorkflow.run. Ensure that all required parameters are correctly passed to maintain functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is incorrect because thedeveloper_idis indeed being passed as part of theembed_payload. The code change correctly includes thedeveloper_idin theEmbedDocsPayload, which is then passed to the workflow. Therefore, the comment does not reflect the actual state of the code.
I might be overlooking some implicit requirement for thedeveloper_idto be passed differently, but the code seems to handle it correctly through theembed_payload.
Theembed_payloadis a common pattern for passing multiple parameters, and the code change aligns with this pattern. The comment does not account for this.
The comment should be deleted because it incorrectly states that thedeveloper_idis missing, while it is actually included in theembed_payload.
2. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/embed_docs.py:15
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the method signature inEmbedDocsWorkflow.runmatches the expected parameters of theembed_docsactivity it calls to avoid runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is asking for a verification, which is not allowed according to the rules. The code change seems to be correctly implemented, as the method signature now matches the expected input type (EmbedDocsPayload). The comment does not point out a definite issue but rather suggests a check, which is not actionable or necessary.
I might be overlooking a potential mismatch between theEmbedDocsPayloadstructure and whatembed_docsexpects. However, the comment does not provide specific evidence of such a mismatch.
The code change appears to be consistent with the import and usage ofEmbedDocsPayload, and the comment does not provide specific evidence of an issue.
Remove the comment as it is asking for verification rather than pointing out a definite issue.
3. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution.py:162
- Draft comment:
Consider simplifying the control flow inTaskExecutionWorkflow.runto enhance readability and maintainability. Additionally, evaluate if the use ofcontinue_as_newis necessary, as it might complicate the workflow's lifecycle management. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is focused on code quality and suggests a refactor to improve readability and maintainability, which is a valid concern. The method is indeed complex, and simplifying it could be beneficial. The comment does not violate any rules as it is not speculative, it is actionable, and it pertains to the code in the diff.
The comment could be seen as too vague, as it does not provide specific suggestions for how to simplify the control flow. It also questions the use ofcontinue_as_newwithout providing a clear reason why it might be unnecessary.
While the comment could be more specific, it still highlights a potential area for improvement in the code's readability and maintainability, which is valuable feedback.
Keep the comment as it provides actionable feedback on code quality, suggesting a refactor for better readability and maintainability.
Workflow ID: wflow_mgEQkFAfRJjp2fDl
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| content: list[str] | ||
| embed_instruction: str | None | ||
| title: str | None = None | ||
| include_title: bool = False # Need to be a separate parameter for the activity |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The include_title field in EmbedDocsPayload is defined but not used in the embed_docs function. If this field is not required, consider removing it to clean up the code.
| all_workflows = context.execution_input.task.workflows | ||
| workflow = context.current_step.workflow | ||
|
|
||
| assert workflow in [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using assertions in production code, as seen in yield_step, can be risky because assertions can be disabled in some Python environments. Consider replacing the assertion with an explicit exception handling mechanism to ensure robust error handling.
| default_settings = active_agent.default_settings | ||
|
|
||
| default_settings: AgentDefaultSettings | None = active_agent.default_settings | ||
| default_settings: dict = ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable default_settings is reassigned from AgentDefaultSettings | None to dict, which can be confusing. Consider using a different variable name for the dictionary representation to improve code clarity.
creatorrr
force-pushed
the
f/task-tests
branch
from
f00b6b1
to
ae6011a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on ae6011a in 1 minute and 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
395lines of code in11files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/embed_docs.py:23
- Draft comment:
The refactoring to useEmbedDocsPayloadfor theembed_docsactivity function enhances readability and maintainability by encapsulating parameters in a structured model. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
Theembed_docsactivity function has been refactored to use a Pydantic modelEmbedDocsPayloadfor its parameters. This change simplifies the function signature and ensures type safety and validation of input data. The function now unpacks the payload and uses its attributes directly, which is a cleaner approach compared to the previous version where parameters were passed individually. The use of Pydantic also allows for easy extension and modification of the input data structure in the future.
2. agents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/transition_step.py:17
- Draft comment:
The update to handle 'wait' type transitions intransition_stepfunction is crucial for supporting asynchronous operations in task executions, enhancing the system's capability to manage complex workflows. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
Thetransition_stepfunction intransition_step.pyhas been updated to handle transitions based on the type specified in thetransition_info. If the transition type is 'wait', it retrieves the task token from the activity's context and assigns it to thetransition_info. This is crucial for handling asynchronous operations where the system needs to pause and wait for an external event or condition before proceeding. The function then proceeds to create the transition in the database using thecreate_execution_transition_queryfunction, which likely updates the execution state in the database to reflect the new transition state.
3. agents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/yield_step.py:20
- Draft comment:
The enhancements inyield_stepfunction to validate the existence of the workflow and handle dynamic transitions based on task configuration improve the robustness and flexibility of task execution workflows. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
Theyield_stepfunction has been updated to handle the transition to a specified workflow step based on the current task's configuration. It first checks if the specified workflow exists within the task's workflows, which is a necessary validation to prevent runtime errors. It then evaluates expressions provided in the step's arguments to compute the arguments for the next step. Finally, it creates aTransitionTargetto specify the next step to transition to, and returns aStepOutcomethat includes the computed arguments and the transition target. This update is crucial for supporting dynamic workflow transitions based on the task configuration and runtime conditions.
4. agents-api/agents_api/autogen/openapi_model.py:2
- Draft comment:
The comprehensive model definitions inopenapi_model.pyenhance type safety and consistency across the API, contributing to the robustness and maintainability of the application. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
Theopenapi_model.pyfile contains definitions for various models used across the API. It includes type aliases, custom types, and assertions to ensure that certain model fields match expected types. These definitions are crucial for ensuring consistency and correctness in data handling throughout the application. The use of Pydantic models and type annotations helps in maintaining type safety and makes the API more robust by catching errors at the development stage rather than at runtime.
5. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/embed_docs.py:12
- Draft comment:
TheEmbedDocsWorkflowefficiently handles document embedding tasks asynchronously, enhancing the system's scalability and performance in processing large or numerous documents. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
TheEmbedDocsWorkflowinembed_docs.pydefines a workflow for embedding documents. It uses theembed_docsactivity to process the embedding of document content. The workflow is designed to handle the embedding task asynchronously, allowing for scalability and efficient processing of potentially large or numerous documents. This setup is crucial for enabling background processing of embeddings, which can be computationally intensive, without blocking the main application flow.
Workflow ID: wflow_kqB7CcH5DqqenWN7
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
creatorrr
force-pushed
the
f/task-tests
branch
from
ae6011a
to
0dc3c32
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 0dc3c32 in 40 seconds
More details
- Looked at
482lines of code in15files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_82mSzQjb9Obb1RS1
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| content: list[str] | ||
| embed_instruction: str | None | ||
| title: str | None = None | ||
| include_title: bool = False # Need to be a separate parameter for the activity |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The include_title field in EmbedDocsPayload is not used in the embed_docs activity and can be misleading. Consider removing it or implementing its functionality in the activity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 150649b in 31 seconds
More details
- Looked at
223lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_lKf52mgNJ3eHIoia
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| async def truncation(session_id: str, token_count_threshold: int) -> None: | ||
| print(session_id, token_count_threshold) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using print for debugging is not recommended in production code. Consider replacing it with Python's logging library for more controlled logging:
added 6 commits
August 16, 2024 23:17
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/task-tests
branch
from
150649b
to
a4e49a0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on a4e49a0 in 30 seconds
More details
- Looked at
26lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_BH3PGeyflmJQG3Ld
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| async def truncation(session_id: str, token_count_threshold: int) -> None: | ||
| print(session_id, token_count_threshold) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider replacing print statements with logging for better control over log levels and outputs. For example:
Signed-off-by: Diwank Tomer <[email protected]>
whiterabbit1983
merged commit d13a46f
into
dev-tasks-disable-routes
1 of 5 checks passed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on be7471b in 47 seconds
More details
- Looked at
43lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/clients/temporal.py:53
- Draft comment:
Ensure thattemporal_task_queueis properly defined and initialized in the configuration files to avoid runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is asking to ensure that 'temporal_task_queue' is properly defined, which is a speculative comment. The code change is straightforward, replacing a hardcoded string with a variable, and any issues with 'temporal_task_queue' would likely be caught during runtime or testing. The comment does not point out a definite issue with the code change itself.
I might be underestimating the importance of ensuring configuration variables are set correctly, but this is generally outside the scope of a code review comment unless there's a clear issue in the code.
While configuration is important, the comment does not address a specific code issue and is more of a general reminder, which is not necessary in this context.
The comment should be removed as it is speculative and does not address a specific code issue.
2. agents-api/pyproject.toml:99
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the new testing configuration withAGENTS_API_TESTINGset totrueis properly handled in the application code to differentiate test executions from production. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is speculative and asks the author to ensure that the new configuration is handled properly, which is not actionable or clear. It does not point out a definite issue in the code. According to the rules, such comments should be removed.
I might be missing the context of how the environment variable is used in the application, but the comment does not specify any definite issue with the current change.
Even if the environment variable is not handled properly, the comment does not provide specific guidance or identify a clear issue, making it unhelpful.
Remove the comment as it is speculative and not actionable, violating the rules for comments.
Workflow ID: wflow_nXYhuhbNYhYhK1sB
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Refactors task execution and transition handling, updates models and SDKs, enhances test coverage, modifies environment configurations, and refactors
temporal.pyfor improved testing setup.Key points:
agents-api/agents_api/activities/embed_docs.pyandagents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/__init__.py.TransitionandTransitionTargetmodels inagents-api/agents_api/autogen/Executions.pyandagents-api/agents_api/autogen/openapi_model.py.prompt_step,evaluate_step,tool_call_step, andtransition_stepinto separate files inagents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/.validate_transition_targetsfunction inagents-api/agents_api/models/execution/create_execution_transition.py.Executions_TransitionandExecutions_TransitionTargettypes.agents-api/tests/fixtures.pyandagents-api/tests/test_activities.py.testingflag inagents-api/agents_api/env.py.agents-api/tests/test_task_routes.py.temporal.py: Usetemporal_task_queuefromenvinrun_task_execution_workflow.pyproject.toml: Addtestingenvironment variable for tests, configurewardas test command.AGENTS_API_TESTINGtotruefor test environment.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev