fix: patch fix for function calling #203
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to 29f65d5
- Looked at
203lines of code in6files - Took 2 minutes and 25 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/types.py:28:
- Assessed confidence :
50% - Comment:
The addition of ellipsis (...) to the class body is a Python convention to indicate that the class is incomplete or abstract, and should be subclassed before it can be used. This is a good practice for abstract base classes. However, the PR lacks a description and it's not clear why these changes were made. The PR author should provide a description explaining the changes. - Reasoning:
The PR author has made changes to the BaseModel classes BaseTask and BaseTaskArgs in both the files agents_api/activities/types.py and agents_api/clients/worker/types.py. The changes are identical in both files, where the author has added an ellipsis (...) to the body of the classes. This is a Python convention to indicate that the class is incomplete or abstract, and should be subclassed before it can be used. This is a good practice for abstract base classes. However, the PR lacks a description and it's not clear why these changes were made. The PR author should provide a description explaining the changes. The PR author has also removed the model validation from the SessionData class in the file agents_api/common/protocol/sessions.py. This could potentially allow invalid models to be used, leading to errors down the line. The PR author should provide a justification for this change. The PR author has added two new functions load_context and get_extra_settings in the file agents_api/model_registry.py. These functions seem to be well implemented and follow good coding practices. However, the PR author should add docstrings to these functions to explain their purpose and usage. The PR author has also made changes to the file agents_api/routers/sessions/session.py, where they have replaced some code with calls to the new functions load_context and get_extra_settings. This is a good practice as it reduces code duplication and improves maintainability. However, the PR author should test these changes thoroughly to ensure they have not introduced any bugs.
2. agents-api/agents_api/common/protocol/sessions.py:40:
- Assessed confidence :
80% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
The removal of the model validation could potentially allow invalid models to be used, leading to errors down the line. The PR author should provide a justification for this change. - Reasoning:
The PR author has removed the model validation from the SessionData class in the file agents_api/common/protocol/sessions.py. This could potentially allow invalid models to be used, leading to errors down the line. The PR author should provide a justification for this change.
3. agents-api/agents_api/model_registry.py:135:
- Assessed confidence :
80% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
The new functionload_contextseems to be well implemented and follows good coding practices. However, it lacks a docstring. The PR author should add a docstring to this function to explain its purpose and usage. - Reasoning:
The PR author has added two new functions load_context and get_extra_settings in the file agents_api/model_registry.py. These functions seem to be well implemented and follow good coding practices. However, the PR author should add docstrings to these functions to explain their purpose and usage.
4. agents-api/agents_api/model_registry.py:157:
- Assessed confidence :
80% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
The new functionget_extra_settingsseems to be well implemented and follows good coding practices. However, it lacks a docstring. The PR author should add a docstring to this function to explain its purpose and usage. - Reasoning:
The PR author has added two new functions load_context and get_extra_settings in the file agents_api/model_registry.py. These functions seem to be well implemented and follow good coding practices. However, the PR author should add docstrings to these functions to explain their purpose and usage.
Workflow ID: wflow_b2TS7K4bPZxa55af
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 3b9b20a
- Looked at
12lines of code in1files - Took 1 minute and 40 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. agents-api/agents_api/model_registry.py:142:
- Assessed confidence :
50% - Comment:
The removal of the 'name' field from the 'init_context' dictionary might cause issues if it's being used elsewhere in the code. Please ensure that this field is not required for OPENAI_MODELS. - Reasoning:
The removal of the 'name' field from the 'init_context' dictionary in the 'load_context' function might cause issues if the 'name' field is being used elsewhere in the code. I need to check if the 'name' field is being used in the OPENAI_MODELS.
Workflow ID: wflow_ohlFOwrcshAUyB8Z
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
This was referenced Apr 18, 2024
This was referenced Apr 26, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This PR includes updates and refactoring across multiple files, with key changes in
BaseTask,BaseTaskArgs,load_context,get_extra_settings,create_agent_query,run, andgeneratefunctions, and removes thenameattribute frominit_contextforOPENAI_MODELS.Key points:
BaseTaskandBaseTaskArgsclasses inagents_api/activities/types.pyandagents_api/clients/worker/types.py.ALL_AVAILABLE_MODELSfromagents_api.model_registryinagents_api/common/protocol/sessions.py.load_contextandget_extra_settingsfunctions inagents_api/model_registry.py.create_agent_queryfunction inagents_api/models/agent/create_agent.py.runandgeneratemethods inagents_api/routers/sessions/session.pyusingload_contextandget_extra_settingsfunctions.load_contextfunction inagents_api/model_registry.py, removed thenameattribute frominit_contextforOPENAI_MODELS.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev