fix: Sessions update #202
Merged
fix: Sessions update #202
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
x/sessions-update
branch
from
3534f3d
to
3114eb6
Compare
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to 3534f3d
- Looked at
168lines of code in5files - Took 1 minute and 32 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. /agents-api/agents_api/models/session/patch_session.py:11:
- Assessed confidence :
100% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
The 'metadata' field has been removed from the _fields list but it's still being used in the datalog query. This could potentially lead to an error if the 'metadata' field is not present in the update_data dictionary. Please ensure that the 'metadata' field is handled correctly. - Reasoning:
The PR author has removed the 'metadata' field from the _fields list in the patch_session.py file. However, the 'metadata' field is still being used in the datalog query in the same file. This could potentially lead to an error if the 'metadata' field is not present in the update_data dictionary. The author should either add the 'metadata' field back to the _fields list or handle the case where 'metadata' is not present in the update_data dictionary.
Workflow ID: wflow_eWmFrIdHqAEGPAgS
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 3114eb6
- Looked at
52lines of code in3files - Took 1 minute and 40 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/types.py:28:
- Assessed confidence :
0% - Comment:
The changes in this file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The...is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. - Reasoning:
The changes in thetypes.pyfiles andcreate_agent.pyfile are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The...in theBaseTaskandBaseTaskArgsclasses is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line increate_agent.pyis also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
2. agents-api/agents_api/clients/worker/types.py:28:
- Assessed confidence :
0% - Comment:
The changes in this file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The...is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. - Reasoning:
The changes in thetypes.pyfiles andcreate_agent.pyfile are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The...in theBaseTaskandBaseTaskArgsclasses is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line increate_agent.pyis also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
3. agents-api/agents_api/models/agent/create_agent.py:42:
- Assessed confidence :
0% - Comment:
The removal of the empty line in this file is a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code. - Reasoning:
The changes in thetypes.pyfiles andcreate_agent.pyfile are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The...in theBaseTaskandBaseTaskArgsclasses is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line increate_agent.pyis also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
Workflow ID: wflow_MORZGbaWwiSG1RgG
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This PR expands classes in
types.py, removes an unnecessary line increate_agent.py, modifies the logic for updating session data, handlesmetadatafield separately during session updates, and replaces:updatewith:putin datalog queries.Key points:
BaseTaskandBaseTaskArgsclasses intypes.pyfiles.create_agent.py.patch_session.pyandupdate_session.py.metadatafield separately in session update.:updatekeyword with:putin datalog query.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev