Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of cycle Offline → ConfigLoader.load → Offline.class #1823

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

Godin
Copy link
Member

@Godin Godin commented Dec 21, 2024

No description provided.

@Godin Godin self-assigned this Dec 21, 2024
@Godin Godin added this to the 0.8.13 milestone Dec 21, 2024
@Godin Godin marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2024 01:25
@Godin Godin requested a review from marchof December 21, 2024 01:29
@Godin
Copy link
Member Author

Godin commented Dec 21, 2024

@marchof I had a look at this cycle as a follow-up of #1822 (comment) and AFAICS this cycle has been there since the introduction of ConfigLoader by commit 47990a4 : RTConfigLoader.loadRT.class, then RT was renamed to Offline by commit 2a8b533 What I don't see - is any reasons for ConfigLoader to use Offline.class.getResourceAsStream instead of ConfigLoader.class.getResourceAsStream, tests also pass after this change. But maybe I and tests miss something, could you please double-check?

@Godin Godin changed the title Get rid of cycle Offline → ConfigLoader.load -> Offline.class Get rid of cycle Offline → ConfigLoader.load → Offline.class Dec 21, 2024
@Godin Godin enabled auto-merge (squash) December 21, 2024 01:31
@Godin Godin force-pushed the get_rid_of_cycle branch from 2512e74 to e78827a Compare January 7, 2025 21:58
@Godin
Copy link
Member Author

Godin commented Jan 10, 2025

@marchof could you please review?

@Godin Godin merged commit d0b62b5 into jacoco:master Jan 13, 2025
34 checks passed
@Godin Godin deleted the get_rid_of_cycle branch January 13, 2025 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants