Skip to content

Add support for node-local-dns in dual-stack cluster. #10891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

axel7born
Copy link
Contributor

node-local-dns accepts only one ip-family as localip. With this PR, we only use addresses of the primary ipfamily.
Queries to address of the secondary ipfamily of the service would not be cached.

How to categorize this PR?

/area networking
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Add support for `node-local-dns` in dual-stack cluster.

node-local-dns accepts only one ip-family as localip. We only use
addresses of the primary ipfamily.
Queries to address of the secondary ipfamily of the service would not be
cached.
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added area/networking Networking related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. labels Nov 21, 2024
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot requested review from ary1992 and plkokanov November 21, 2024 10:19
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 21, 2024
@axel7born
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @ScheererJ @DockToFuture

Copy link
Member

@ScheererJ ScheererJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for mitigating dual-stack support for node-local-dns while we wait for kubernetes/dns#655 and kubernetes/dns#657 to be resolved.

@ScheererJ
Copy link
Member

/assign

@ScheererJ
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve
/retest

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

gardener-prow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 01fc1e70999bf31bde180b0c53eaa2cbab863bcf

Copy link
Contributor

gardener-prow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ScheererJ

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 26, 2024
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot merged commit fb6c0d9 into gardener:master Nov 26, 2024
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/networking Networking related cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants