Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ingestion/lookml): resolve CLL issue caused by column name casing. #11876

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sid-acryl
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata label Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should be using the schema resolver to fix things automatically, instead of just having an additional config

@sid-acryl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

we should be using the schema resolver to fix things automatically, instead of just having an additional config

Ok

@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added the needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. label Nov 20, 2024
@hsheth2 hsheth2 added pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter and removed needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. labels Nov 20, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. and removed pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter labels Dec 1, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter and removed needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. labels Dec 6, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. and removed pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter labels Dec 9, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter and removed needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. labels Dec 9, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. and removed pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter labels Dec 10, 2024

schema_resolver.add_raw_schema_info(
urn=input_urn,
schema_info={"name": "STRING"},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does this test do that test_basic_schema_resolver does not do?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test is calling resolve_urn instead of resolve_table

@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter and removed needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. labels Dec 10, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. and removed pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter labels Dec 11, 2024
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added pending-submitter-merge and removed needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. labels Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata pending-submitter-merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants