Skip to content

Conversation

@mhayter
Copy link
Contributor

@mhayter mhayter commented Aug 24, 2025

I wasn't sure if we wanted a supporters page on the actual website. Regardless I think having a "Legendary Supporters" page is appropriate for the founders and/or substantial supporters like @jakobkogler and @adamant-pwn.

This likely should be automated at some point (scrape the analysis page on github).

@mhayter
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhayter commented Aug 26, 2025

I think it would make sense to have original authors/translators as part of the subtitle to ensure their lasting contribution is recognized. Unfortunately, if someone moves an article (like I did with Longest Increasing Subsequence), they get the credit. Perhaps enshrining original authors in the "Supporters" page would makes sense to show how important each supporter has been. This would rightfully recognize our authors and further incentivize future authorship. What do you all think?

@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Member

adamant-pwn commented Sep 3, 2025

I think, if we are to merge this, we'd need to add some meaningful text here, explaining in more detail what the page is about. But also so far we don't have any monthly contributors that would qualify to be mentioned on the website, hence we can wait with that until we actually have some...

I would also separate "supporters" as in people providing monetary support and "contributors", as in people actually doing work for the project.

change financial contributors vs contributors
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants