Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix PatchesView._mask_data() for secondary ranges #14016

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

mattpap
Copy link
Contributor

@mattpap mattpap commented Aug 7, 2024

This was fixed as an example in today's bokeh development session.

TODO:

  • find and fix other related cases

fixes #14013

@mattpap mattpap added this to the 3.6 milestone Aug 7, 2024
@mattpap mattpap merged commit 5aecc61 into branch-3.6 Aug 9, 2024
22 checks passed
@mattpap mattpap deleted the mattpap/14013_Patches_mask_data branch August 9, 2024 09:33
@mattpap mattpap mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2024
12 tasks
@mattpap mattpap modified the milestones: 3.6, 3.5.2 Aug 22, 2024
Chiemezuo pushed a commit to Chiemezuo/bokeh that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Glyphs should correctly use configured ranges
2 participants