Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only need libunwind for testing #2093

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Only need libunwind for testing #2093

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

justsmth
Copy link
Contributor

@justsmth justsmth commented Jan 3, 2025

Description of changes:

  • Libunwind is only needed when building tests.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and the ISC license.

@justsmth justsmth requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2025 13:33
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.76%. Comparing base (6aa30a9) to head (93b61f4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2093   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.75%   78.76%           
=======================================
  Files         598      598           
  Lines      103653   103653           
  Branches    14720    14720           
=======================================
+ Hits        81634    81640    +6     
+ Misses      21365    21361    -4     
+ Partials      654      652    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@justsmth justsmth enabled auto-merge (squash) January 3, 2025 14:51
@justsmth justsmth merged commit 4b47231 into aws:main Jan 3, 2025
125 checks passed
@justsmth justsmth deleted the no-libunwind branch January 3, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants