-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sagemaker: Create L2 construct for Amazon SageMaker #2809
Comments
Based closely on PR aws#2888, this commit introduces the Endpoint L2 construct and the L2 constructs on which it depends, including Model and EndpointConfig. Departures from PR aws#2888 include: - EndpointConfig definition moved into its own L2 construct as one EndpointConfig resource may be shared by multiple Endpoints. - An Endpoint-specific IEndpointProductionVariant interface was added to support "metric*" and "autoScale*" APIs per endpoint-variant combination. - The Notebook construct was excluded from this new commit to limit changes to model hosting use-cases only. - Feedback on the earlier PR has been incorporated into this new commit. fixes aws#2809 Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
See #6107 for the most recent PR. |
This is the first of three PRs to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 fixes aws#2809 Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
This is the first of three PRs to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 fixes #2809 Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]> ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
|
@kaizencc Even though only the first of three model hosting PRs have been merged, this issue was auto-closed due to (I assume) the presence of
|
@petermeansrock done :). Let's just say something like |
This is the second of three PRs to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 related to aws#2809 Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
This is the second of three PRs to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 related to #2809 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license* ---- Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
This is the third and final PR to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 closes aws#2809 Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
This is the third and final PR to complete the implementation of RFC 431: aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#431 closes #2809 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license* ---- Co-authored-by: Matt McClean <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Long Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Drew Jetter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murali Ganesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Abilash Rangoju <[email protected]>
|
There is currently only L1 support for Amazon SageMaker. Would be nice to have an L2 construct to support SageMaker notebook instances, models and endpoints.
This is being actively worked on in three phases 🚀:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: