-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handling encryption logic when only one non-root partition is encrypted (such as /home) #2575
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ade crypttab logic able to handle multiple calls via override logic.
…king if root is encrypted or not for keyfile logic
def should_generate_encryption_keyfile(self, dev: PartitionModification | LvmVolume) -> bool: | ||
# If all partitions being encrypted, are non-root file systems | ||
# we will not generate key-files as their safety can not be guaranteed. | ||
if all([part.mountpoint != Path('/') for part in self.partitions]): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just FYI there's a part.is_root()
:)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check doesn't feel right here...on the caller side this is run for each partition now, but we can probably short circuit it
def generate_keyfile_for_dev(self, dev: PartitionModification | LvmVolume) -> bool:
# If all partitions being encrypted, are non-root file systems
# we will not generate key-files as their safety can not be guaranteed.
if isinstance(dev, PartitionModification):
return dev in self.partitions and dev.mountpoint != Path('/')
elif isinstance(dev, LvmVolume):
return dev in self.lvm_volumes and dev.mountpoint != Path('/')
return False
def generate_keyfiles(self) -> bool:
# If all partitions being encrypted, are non-root file systems
# we will not generate key-files as their safety can not be guaranteed.
if all([part.mountpoint != Path('/') for part in self.partitions]):
return True
return False
And on the caller
def _setup_luks_unlock_partitions(self) -> None:
if not self._disk_encryption.generate_keyfiles():
return
...
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just FYI there's a
part.is_root()
:)
Silly me just copied the code from two rows down, but now that you mention it I do remember seeing that function, I'll change!
archinstall/lib/luks.py
Outdated
for index, existing_row in enumerate(existing_data): | ||
if uuid in existing_row: | ||
if override is False: | ||
print(f"Found {uuid} in {existing_row}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we change this to debug(...)
rather as it's not really relevant for the user
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course, it's still a draft and used print when executing blocks of code in isolated test.py
outside of archinstall :) but good reminder!
if uuid in existing_row: | ||
if override is False: | ||
print(f"Found {uuid} in {existing_row}") | ||
return True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this return here right? If override is passed into the function should this terminate ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's checking if we don't want to override - but it found that we already have added the data - so it's happy and returns "done" :)
archinstall/lib/luks.py
Outdated
|
||
existing_data.append(new_row) | ||
|
||
print(f"Writing {existing_data}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will show up during the installation for the user probably not very useful, debug(...)
probably better here
PR Description:
This should make single-non-root-encrypted-partitions be unlocked via
/etc/crypttab
instead of via keyfile, as the keyfile would be unprotected.Tests and Checks