Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #6380
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
9127e97 doc: Mention RPC strings for monetary amounts in release notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7d226b7 [QA] add testcases for parsing strings as values (Jonas Schnelli)
614601b rpc: Accept strings in AmountFromValue (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
  • Loading branch information
laanwj committed Jul 27, 2015
2 parents d43297c + 9127e97 commit 240b30e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 57 additions and 22 deletions.
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions doc/release-notes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,10 +19,13 @@ https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en

This allows running bitcoind without having to do any manual configuration.

Example header
----------------------
Low-level RPC API changes
--------------------------

Example content.
- Monetary amounts can be provided as strings. This means that for example the
argument to sendtoaddress can be "0.0001" instead of 0.0001. This can be an
advantage if a JSON library insists on using a lossy floating point type for
numbers, which would be dangerous for monetary amounts.

0.12.0 Change log
=================
Expand Down
66 changes: 49 additions & 17 deletions qa/rpc-tests/wallet.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.

#
# Exercise the wallet. Ported from wallet.sh.
# Exercise the wallet. Ported from wallet.sh.
# Does the following:
# a) creates 3 nodes, with an empty chain (no blocks).
# b) node0 mines a block
# c) node1 mines 101 blocks, so now nodes 0 and 1 have 50btc, node2 has none.
# c) node1 mines 101 blocks, so now nodes 0 and 1 have 50btc, node2 has none.
# d) node0 sends 21 btc to node2, in two transactions (11 btc, then 10 btc).
# e) node0 mines a block, collects the fee on the second transaction
# f) node1 mines 100 blocks, to mature node0's just-mined block
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ def run_test (self):
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 21)

# Node0 should have two unspent outputs.
# Create a couple of transactions to send them to node2, submit them through
# node1, and make sure both node0 and node2 pick them up properly:
# Create a couple of transactions to send them to node2, submit them through
# node1, and make sure both node0 and node2 pick them up properly:
node0utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent(1)
assert_equal(len(node0utxos), 2)

# create both transactions
txns_to_send = []
for utxo in node0utxos:
for utxo in node0utxos:
inputs = []
outputs = {}
inputs.append({ "txid" : utxo["txid"], "vout" : utxo["vout"]})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -149,35 +149,35 @@ def run_test (self):
sync_mempools(self.nodes)

assert(txid1 in self.nodes[3].getrawmempool())

#check if we can list zero value tx as available coins
#1. create rawtx
#2. hex-changed one output to 0.0
#2. hex-changed one output to 0.0
#3. sign and send
#4. check if recipient (node0) can list the zero value tx
usp = self.nodes[1].listunspent()
inputs = [{"txid":usp[0]['txid'], "vout":usp[0]['vout']}]
outputs = {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): 49.998, self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 11.11}

rawTx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs).replace("c0833842", "00000000") #replace 11.11 with 0.0 (int32)
decRawTx = self.nodes[1].decoderawtransaction(rawTx)
signedRawTx = self.nodes[1].signrawtransaction(rawTx)
decRawTx = self.nodes[1].decoderawtransaction(signedRawTx['hex'])
zeroValueTxid= decRawTx['txid']
sendResp = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signedRawTx['hex'])

self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1) #mine a block
self.sync_all()

unspentTxs = self.nodes[0].listunspent() #zero value tx must be in listunspents output
found = False
for uTx in unspentTxs:
if uTx['txid'] == zeroValueTxid:
found = True
assert_equal(uTx['amount'], Decimal('0.00000000'));
assert(found)

#do some -walletbroadcast tests
stop_nodes(self.nodes)
wait_bitcoinds()
Expand All @@ -192,17 +192,17 @@ def run_test (self):
self.nodes[1].generate(1) #mine a block, tx should not be in there
self.sync_all()
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), Decimal('59.99800000')); #should not be changed because tx was not broadcasted

#now broadcast from another node, mine a block, sync, and check the balance
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(txObjNotBroadcasted['hex'])
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
self.sync_all()
txObjNotBroadcasted = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txIdNotBroadcasted)
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), Decimal('61.99800000')); #should not be

#create another tx
txIdNotBroadcasted = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), 2);

#restart the nodes with -walletbroadcast=1
stop_nodes(self.nodes)
wait_bitcoinds()
Expand All @@ -211,12 +211,44 @@ def run_test (self):
connect_nodes_bi(self.nodes,1,2)
connect_nodes_bi(self.nodes,0,2)
sync_blocks(self.nodes)

self.nodes[0].generate(1)
sync_blocks(self.nodes)

#tx should be added to balance because after restarting the nodes tx should be broadcastet
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), Decimal('63.99800000')); #should not be


#send a tx with value in a string (PR#6380 +)
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "2")
txObj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId)
assert_equal(txObj['amount'], Decimal('-2.00000000'))

txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "0.0001")
txObj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId)
assert_equal(txObj['amount'], Decimal('-0.00010000'))

#check if JSON parser can handle scientific notation in strings
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1e-4")
txObj = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txId)
assert_equal(txObj['amount'], Decimal('-0.00010000'))

#this should fail
errorString = ""
try:
txId = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(), "1f-4")
except JSONRPCException,e:
errorString = e.error['message']

assert_equal("Invalid amount" in errorString, True);

errorString = ""
try:
self.nodes[0].generate("2") #use a string to as block amount parameter must fail because it's not interpreted as amount
except JSONRPCException,e:
errorString = e.error['message']

assert_equal("not an integer" in errorString, True);


if __name__ == '__main__':
WalletTest ().main ()
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/rpcserver.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ void RPCTypeCheckObj(const UniValue& o,

CAmount AmountFromValue(const UniValue& value)
{
if (!value.isNum())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_TYPE_ERROR, "Amount is not a number");
if (!value.isNum() && !value.isStr())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_TYPE_ERROR, "Amount is not a number or string");
CAmount amount;
if (!ParseFixedPoint(value.getValStr(), 8, &amount))
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_TYPE_ERROR, "Invalid amount");
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 240b30e

Please sign in to comment.