Merge #9357: [0.13 backport] Attempt reconstruction from all compact …

…block announcements 53b656f [qa] Update compactblocks test for multi-peer reconstruction (Suhas Daftuar) 4ced313 Allow compactblock reconstruction when block is in flight (Suhas Daftuar)
TrezarCoin · Dec 19, 2016 · 03b6f62 · 03b6f62
2 parents fb987b3 + 53b656f
commit 03b6f62
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 101 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py
@@ -757,6 +757,54 @@ def request_cb_announcements(self, peer, node, version):
         msg.announce = True
         peer.send_and_ping(msg)
 
+    def test_compactblock_reconstruction_multiple_peers(self, node, stalling_peer, delivery_peer):
+        assert(len(self.utxos))
+
+        def announce_cmpct_block(node, peer):
+            utxo = self.utxos.pop(0)
+            block = self.build_block_with_transactions(node, utxo, 5)
+
+            cmpct_block = HeaderAndShortIDs()
+            cmpct_block.initialize_from_block(block)
+            msg = msg_cmpctblock(cmpct_block.to_p2p())
+            peer.send_and_ping(msg)
+            with mininode_lock:
+                assert(peer.last_getblocktxn is not None)
+            return block, cmpct_block
+
+        block, cmpct_block = announce_cmpct_block(node, stalling_peer)
+
+        for tx in block.vtx[1:]:
+            delivery_peer.send_message(msg_tx(tx))
+        delivery_peer.sync_with_ping()
+        mempool = node.getrawmempool()
+        for tx in block.vtx[1:]:
+            assert(tx.hash in mempool)
+
+        delivery_peer.send_and_ping(msg_cmpctblock(cmpct_block.to_p2p()))
+        assert_equal(int(node.getbestblockhash(), 16), block.sha256)
+
+        self.utxos.append([block.vtx[-1].sha256, 0, block.vtx[-1].vout[0].nValue])
+
+        # Now test that delivering an invalid compact block won't break relay
+
+        block, cmpct_block = announce_cmpct_block(node, stalling_peer)
+        for tx in block.vtx[1:]:
+            delivery_peer.send_message(msg_tx(tx))
+        delivery_peer.sync_with_ping()
+
+        cmpct_block.prefilled_txn[0].tx.wit.vtxinwit = [ CTxInWitness() ]
+        cmpct_block.prefilled_txn[0].tx.wit.vtxinwit[0].scriptWitness.stack = [ser_uint256(0)]
+
+        cmpct_block.use_witness = True
+        delivery_peer.send_and_ping(msg_cmpctblock(cmpct_block.to_p2p()))
+        assert(int(node.getbestblockhash(), 16) != block.sha256)
+
+        msg = msg_blocktxn()
+        msg.block_transactions.blockhash = block.sha256
+        msg.block_transactions.transactions = block.vtx[1:]
+        stalling_peer.send_and_ping(msg)
+        assert_equal(int(node.getbestblockhash(), 16), block.sha256)
 
     def run_test(self):
         # Setup the p2p connections and start up the network thread.
@@ -841,6 +889,10 @@ def run_test(self):
         self.test_invalid_tx_in_compactblock(self.nodes[1], self.segwit_node, False)
         self.test_invalid_tx_in_compactblock(self.nodes[1], self.old_node, False)
 
+        print("\tTesting reconstructing compact blocks from all peers...")
+        self.test_compactblock_reconstruction_multiple_peers(self.nodes[1], self.segwit_node, self.old_node)
+        sync_blocks(self.nodes)
+
         # Advance to segwit activation
         print ("\nAdvancing to segwit activation\n")
         self.activate_segwit(self.nodes[1])

diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
@@ -5650,6 +5650,11 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
         CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock;
         vRecv >> cmpctblock;
 
+        // Keep a CBlock for "optimistic" compactblock reconstructions (see
+        // below)
+        CBlock block;
+        bool fBlockReconstructed = false;
+
         LOCK(cs_main);
 
         if (mapBlockIndex.find(cmpctblock.header.hashPrevBlock) == mapBlockIndex.end()) {
@@ -5758,6 +5763,23 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
                     req.blockhash = pindex->GetBlockHash();
                     pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::GETBLOCKTXN, req);
                 }
+            } else {
+                // This block is either already in flight from a different
+                // peer, or this peer has too many blocks outstanding to
+                // download from.
+                // Optimistically try to reconstruct anyway since we might be
+                // able to without any round trips.
+                PartiallyDownloadedBlock tempBlock(&mempool);
+                ReadStatus status = tempBlock.InitData(cmpctblock);
+                if (status != READ_STATUS_OK) {
+                    // TODO: don't ignore failures
+                    return true;
+                }
+                std::vector<CTransaction> dummy;
+                status = tempBlock.FillBlock(block, dummy);
+                if (status == READ_STATUS_OK) {
+                    fBlockReconstructed = true;
+                }
             }
         } else {
             if (fAlreadyInFlight) {
@@ -5778,6 +5800,33 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
             }
         }
 
+        if (fBlockReconstructed) {
+            // If we got here, we were able to optimistically reconstruct a
+            // block that is in flight from some other peer.  However, this
+            // cmpctblock may be invalid.  In particular, while we've checked
+            // that the block merkle root commits to the transaction ids, we
+            // haven't yet checked that tx witnesses are properly committed to
+            // in the coinbase witness commitment.
+            //
+            // ProcessNewBlock will call MarkBlockAsReceived(), which will
+            // clear any in-flight compact block state that might be present
+            // from some other peer.  We don't want a malleated compact block
+            // request to interfere with block relay, so we don't want to call
+            // ProcessNewBlock until we've already checked that the witness
+            // commitment is correct.
+            {
+                LOCK(cs_main);
+                CValidationState dummy;
+                if (!ContextualCheckBlock(block, dummy, pindex->pprev)) {
+                    // TODO: could send reject message to peer?
+                    return true;
+                }
+            }
+            CValidationState state;
+            ProcessNewBlock(state, chainparams, pfrom, &block, true, NULL, false);
+            // TODO: could send reject message if block is invalid?
+        }
+
         CheckBlockIndex(chainparams.GetConsensus());
     }