-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Run scheduled CI jobs only on upstream repo #6157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
youknowone
merged 4 commits into
RustPython:main
from
ShaharNaveh:cron-ci-on-upstream-only
Sep 20, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0c22ef3
Run scheduled CI jobs only on upstream repo
ShaharNaveh 97a340b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into cron-ci-on-upstream…
ShaharNaveh fcf3cfa
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into cron-ci-on-upstream…
ShaharNaveh 40d0749
Only disable if scheduling on forks
ShaharNaveh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
Run scheduled CI jobs only on upstream repo
- Loading branch information
commit 0c22ef3fa3a004a69cd2a15478e081d9f94665ee
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Though I don't know well about actions. What if we need to edit release.yml? Then isn't it better to run it on the fork?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I understand your concern. this only prevents this job from triggering on RustPython forks, like mine:
https://github.com/ShaharNaveh/RustPython/actions/workflows/release.yml
I see that you disabled it manually for yourself lol:
https://github.com/youknowone/RustPython/actions/workflows/cron-ci.yaml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that I get what you mean, we can have something like:
this way it will always run on the upstream repo and can still be triggered with workflow_dispatch on forks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I can't remember why I did it. Probably cron-ci was broken once a while ago. And never be fixed and forgotten.
The event_name check makes sense. Thanks!