@ianstcdns Please review

Given that the MIT license requires the copyright message to be placed in every file (“substantial portions”) regardless, it does seem a bit redundant to include a separate file with the same message. Is this something that Amazon is planning to standardize across the Partner-Supported and Community-Supported repos? Because only 2 of the 9-10 ports have license files, although these appear to be named LICENSE.md instead.

If this is part of a broader effort to standardize to this practice, I’m happy to go along with it, but if it’s only applied to the Xtensa port, I think our preference would be to leave this as-is.

@aggarg @RichardBarry

I filed an issue to get LICENSE files added to each port since the top level LICENSE file in this repo defers to them, but they currently don't exist. (https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel-Partner-Supported-Ports/blob/main/README.md). So either that should be changed, or LICENSE files properly setup for each port.

Thanks; sounds good. I don't see an approve button, but I'm fine with this getting merged as-is.