Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove cpu.shares from documentation as removed from check #10697

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2021
Merged

Remove cpu.shares from documentation as removed from check #10697

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2021

Conversation

vboulineau
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Remove cpu.shares from doc as removed from check: #9969

Motivation

Align doc

Additional Notes

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • PR title must be written as a CHANGELOG entry (see why)
  • Files changes must correspond to the primary purpose of the PR as described in the title (small unrelated changes should have their own PR)
  • PR must have changelog/ and integration/ labels attached

@vboulineau vboulineau requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2021 10:51
@vboulineau vboulineau merged commit 17ad20d into master Dec 27, 2021
@vboulineau vboulineau deleted the vboulineau/container-cpu-shares branch December 27, 2021 09:34
cswatt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
@vboulineau @cswatt
Remove cpu.shares from documentation as removed from check (#10697)
eff1d6f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang fanny-jiang approved these changes

@celenechang celenechang celenechang approved these changes

@davidor davidor davidor approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
changelog/no-changelog integration/container
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@vboulineau @davidor @celenechang @fanny-jiang