Wikipedia:Historical archive/Policy
Appearance
Policy proposals and discussions
- Approval mechanism - a proposal from September 2001 for a system of quality assurance and marking for Wikipedia articles, which was discussed for the next four years
- Naming conventions (slogans) - a short-lived de facto convention on how to deal with the titles of articles about slogans, which existed from June 2003 to November 2005
- Naming policy poll - Poll which took place in May 2004, on how policy should address place names which differ between their official form and common form among speakers of English
- Notability - most if not all of the Wikipedia-wide guideline/policy proposals, and development-influential essays, relating to notability in some way or another, with their active development lifespans, and notes
- PolicyPolicy – an early discussion on policy enforcement
- RefactoringPolicy – an early discussion on how and where discussion of articles should be conducted
- Rules to consider – the earliest discussions of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including the first edits to that page
- Summary of the debate about the neutral point of view – mostly preserved for its page history
- To delete or not to delete – debate on deletion (May–July 2001)
- What's in, what's out - venue for discussing what Wikipedia should or shouldn't include (April 2004–December 2005)
All items in this collection
Project space
- Historical archive/Policy
- Historical archive/Policy/Approval mechanism
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming conventions (slogans)
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming policy poll
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming policy poll/FAQ
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Arguments
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Essay
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Fame and importance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Importance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Informative
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/List of ways to verify notability of articles
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Non-notability
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Non-notability/Essay
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Notability changes
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Significance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Template:Pnc
- Historical archive/Policy/PolicyPolicy
- Historical archive/Policy/RefactoringPolicy
- Historical archive/Policy/Rules to consider
- Historical archive/Policy/Summary of the debate about the neutral point of view
- Historical archive/Policy/To delete or not to delete
- Historical archive/Policy/What's in, what's out
Project talk space
- Historical archive/Policy/Approval mechanism
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming conventions (slogans)
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming policy poll
- Historical archive/Policy/Naming policy poll/FAQ
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Arguments
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Essay
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Fame and importance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Importance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Importance/Archive 01
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Informative
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/List of ways to verify notability of articles
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Non-notability
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Non-notability/Essay
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Notability changes
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Significance
- Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Template:Pnc
- Historical archive/Policy/Rules to consider
- Historical archive/Policy/Rules to consider/Archive 1
- Historical archive/Policy/What's in, what's out
- Historical archive/Policy/What's in, what's out/Archive 1