Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector TDx
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vector TDx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Got reviews from IGN and PocketGamer, everything else is an unreliable source or trivial mention. Attempts to find significant coverage in magazines failed. Doesn't seem to pass the notability threshold for a new article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Could not find more sources about this game. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just want to indicate it clearly that I'm undecided on whether the article should be deleted due to the sources I've listed below. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this might get there. Small review from The Guardian [1]. My read of WP:SALON.COM is that it's borderline as a source. ~ A412 talk! 15:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's fairly small, so I won't immediately withdraw the nomination, though I do admit that it might push people to "weak keep". Now I essentially have no opinion about whether it should get deleted or not. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I dug through the web and found few more sources: Four more passing mentions on IGN, JayIsGames (twice), Four more passing mentions on Kotaku, and a few more articles on PocketGamer (1, 2, 3, 4). Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's fairly small, so I won't immediately withdraw the nomination, though I do admit that it might push people to "weak keep". Now I essentially have no opinion about whether it should get deleted or not. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An assessment of newly found sources would be helpful to a closer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)- Flash Element TD as a predecessor could be a WP:ATD. IgelRM (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm seeing only slight mentions of that game in gaming magazines, though, and nothing close to SIGCOV. It seems non-notable by all respects. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Flash Element TD as a predecessor could be a WP:ATD. IgelRM (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)