Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Okure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Okure

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately there's no significant coverage about the subject. I have found enough mentions, but all of them are just passing, not even a paragraph. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. For now the subject fails WP:GNG. Less Unless (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NPROF; she is Professor of Scripture and Gender Hermeneutics at CIWA (the only professor in their Biblical Theology Dept., and one of the first two professors of CIWA), founding president of the Catholic Biblical Association of Nigeria, and has published widely on Christian theology, feminism, Christianity in Africa [1], [2], [3] . Furius (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just being a Professor is not enough. I don't see how she passes NPROF - to pass crit 1 there should be a significant number of citations which unfortunately the subject doesn't have. All the other criteria can't be applied. I regret, but she doesn't pass NPROF either. Less Unless (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a Google Books search yields coverage that is, in my view, sufficient to pass at least the GNG and possibly the first criterion of NPROF. Take, for instance, this, this, this, and possibly this, all of which discuss her scholarship in considerable detail and treat her as an important expert in her field. There are additional Google Books results, and the coverage available via Google Scholar also appears to be substantial. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary Writ, wow, great job. I've done a thorough search but for some reason these didn't come up. I'm happy to withdraw my nomination. The refs presented show her notability. Less Unless (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In accordance with these additional secondary sources.--Ipigott (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw I am happy to withdraw my nomination after the new sources have been found that show the subjects notability. Less Unless (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.