Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mu-onna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mu-onna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for almost a decade now Orange Mike | Talk 06:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only sources I can find are mentioning this as a demon character from Inuyasha, so I think the article is mistaken and assumed the character was an actual type of Japanese demon. Either way, there doesn't seem to be enough sources out there for this to be considered notable enough to have its own article or even be merged to List of Inuyasha characters. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tried researching Japanese articles about "mu-onna" and only found mentions of InuYasha. It doesn't seem like it's a demon in Japanese folklore. lullabying (talk) 06:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears more fancruft than actual mythology._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It appears to be based solely on a manga series and is unsourced.IphisOfCrete (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No ja interwiki is a bad sign (hoax?). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.