Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladedaism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced joke "philosophy" that I can't believe has stayed on WP for over a year. NawlinWiki 20:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Guess the occasional one slips through the net, then doesn't get unearthed for a year because nobody searches for it and it links to nothing else. Ah well. ~ Matticus78 20:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V. No sources. Probably WP:HOAX or at least WP:OR. Scorpiondollprincess 20:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, good catch! At the same time I will recommend people to check out Wikipedia:Dead-end pages, which contains many garbageous "articles". Punkmorten 20:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to mention plenty of articles in need of wikifying and other attention (I just now overhauled a decent but unformatted and uncategorised article I found there). ~ Matticus78 21:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. --Merovingian (T, C, @) 20:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Scorpiondollprincess. Paddles TC 21:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Obladi, oblada, delete this la, la la how the cruft goes on. Danny Lilithborne 01:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.