Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Trump

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Donald Trump Jr.#Family. Overwhelming consensus not to keep this as a standalone page, but no convincing arguments against the broadly supported ATD. Owen× 14:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Trump (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor member of the extended Trump clan who has no history beyond a speech at the GOP convention. Probably ought to redirect to Dad's list of offspring given that except for the one sentence its all either very basic tabloid/royal-watcher detail or is about other people. Not seeing any independent notability and I don't see having a WP:BLP on a minor child on the basis of one public appearance. Mangoe (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete Redirect to Donald Trump Jr.#Family per nom. and others. A case of WP:NOTINHERITED, fails WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 22:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Whatever you think about the patriarchy, it's that name Trump and her descent through his son that makes anyone care about her. And again, the problem with redirecting to the family article, how many times am I going to have to say it, is that it doesn't mention her. If you want to F the patriarchy, then change your response to "delete". Mangoe (talk) 16:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why this needs explanation but a WP:MERGE involves taking content from one article and putting it in another article, so it's ok if it's not there already. She isn't famous because of who her father is, she is famous because of who her grandfather is. And including the family members in an article about the family is better than merging a daughter to her father's article simply because he's her father. Levivich (talk) 17:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly because I lost track that you had switched to a merge outcome. I mean, if you feel up to writing up all the rest of Don Sr.'s grandchildren, I suppose, it would be seriously WP:UNDUE to put details about only her so you could justify the redirect. And I really don't see how there's anything much to merge other than the info that's already in Don Jr.'s article. I don't know why we're repeating her birth weight other than because we can, and as far as I can see the entire last paragraph is about other people. And I still don't see your argument. Mangoe (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't be anymore obvious the demands for deletion are based on political grievance, inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aihyah (talkcontribs) 07:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.