Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Jurgensmeyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jet Jurgensmeyer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article relies entirely on self-published sources and unreliable sources (FamousBirthdays and IMDb). nyuszika7h (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Generates some sourcing "heat" for Legends of the Hidden Temple: The Movie and The Little Rascals Save the Day, but I'm inclined to think it's not enough. I lean in the direction of this being WP:TOOSOON here. But I won't vote yet, and could be persuaded otherwise, sourcing quality permitted... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we need very good sources to keep articles on minors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep – Ulch! I can't believe I'm saying this, but under Wikipedia's current (what I consider to be low) notability standards, I think Jurgensmeyer actually clears WP:NACTOR – among The Little Rascals Save the Day, Adventures in Babysitting (2016 film) and Legends of the Hidden Temple (2016 film), I think he's got it. I've added some mainline sourcing to the article to, and cut down on the promotional stuff. It's possible there's even more secondary sourcing out there (though I tend to doubt it). In any case, under the current "rules of the game", I think Jurgensmeyer is currently a "weak keep". (Failing that, this article would be a strong candidate for "Draftifying"...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources are 1) his own site 2) a short article about him (good source) 3) the rest are name-checks. I don't find anything better in a quick search. (There is one St. Louis Dispatch article, but it's all quotes from him.) Too soon, plus, really, what is there to say in any depth about a child star? Let's hope he has a good career ahead of him. LaMona (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- By that standard it's "one and a half" (at least) – THR one is good, and the Variety one on Legend of the Hidden Temple is more than a "name check" and is a fair GNG ref. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep. marginal. but there was this "Nashville, It's 'Jet's' World.(Malone, Janice. The Tennessee Tribune [Nashville, Tenn] 23 June 2016: 2B [1]) profile in a hometown paper in Nashville, with details from which bio can be sourced - first role was in his parent's dinner theatre. There another home state/regional paper wrote up a role he played when he was a 5-year-old Sharayah Daves lands big role in Alan Jackson video [2]), More coverage form when he was 5 (Concert at the Loveless benefits flood relief, The Tennessean [Nashville, Tenn] 06 May 2010. Chattanooga Times Free Press [Chattanooga, Tenn] 28 Aug 2009: H.23.) Most coverage of his more recent roles are mere mentions, but as user User:IJBall says, unless we are going to change the WP:NACTOR guideline, there is the fact that this can be sourced to RS, there is at least a some actual coverage (going back to minor child actor stints), and he has been in several bluelinked films. (btw, which one was "Spanky"?).E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:NACTOR. -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there's at least enough convincing for now. SwisterTwister talk 19:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.