Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As hoax. Contact me if you would like to restore it for inclusion in the hoax list j⚛e decker ^talk 01:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Howard's Law

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to rely on one "source" that's questionable at best. A quick Google search on this subject indicates that it could be a hoax. An IP user suggested on the talk page back in 2008 that this could be a hoax but no further action was taken at that time or any other time. If not a hoax, I don't see this subject meeting the notability criteria. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - possibly a hoax, based on my inability to find any online searches about this specific cardiac diagnostic tool; Google searches find many false positives. Bearian (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Definitely seems like a hoax. If it is, be sure to put it on Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. I personally have never heard of any medical dictums referred to as laws, and it seems weird that a medicinal phenomenon requires a complex equation to describe it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexschmidt711 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.