Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinckley Band of Thieves
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hinckley Band of Thieves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability. The only google hits Hinckley Band of Thieves are wikipedia mirrors. The "lead" member Fredric Hinckley doesn't appear to exist. No reputable sources. Nothing to support claim the band existed for upwards of 170 years. No significant content (eg. location, impact on society, history.) No content added since 2005. Hoax? Gwinva (talk) 00:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:V. Probably has something to do with a game or a Web site or something of the sort, but it doesn't satisfy any of the criteria of the WP:GNG. Deor (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Geschichte (talk) 06:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete either a hoax for a fictional element so minor even Google hasn't heard of it. Delete either way. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: could find nothing, therefore delete. Dewritech (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. None of the people mentioned appears in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Searches for "Hinckley" in the Bibliography of British and Irish History, the British Humanities Index and Historical Abstracts produce no relevant results. EALacey (talk) 10:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable at best, probable hoax. Edward321 (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.